0
This question contains a logical fallacy that prevents it from being answerable.
The question inherently presumes that global warming is a hoax, which hasn't remotely been established.
It's a "smuggled premise" question, which is essentially an admission of defeat in formal debate.
In this case (since this isn't a formal debate) it simply renders the question irrelevant and unanswerable.
What else can I help you with?
What are fluorocarbons?
Something made up by Liberals to scare you into believing the hoax of global warming.
Why is the hoax of man-made global warming being pushed by some of the Senators and Congressman of the United States?
They understand the seriousness of global warming and they want to leave the world a better place for their children and grandchildren.
What evidence do global warming deniers give that global warming is a hoax?
1) if the ice melts in the northern/ southern region of the world, the water level wont rise. BECAUSE that water is froze, it is expanded.
How is the economic impact of global warming a hoax?
As the insurance companies put up their premiums, and people realize the cost of relocating waterside suburbs and building seawalls, and growing and developing different kinds of crops, and training farmers in new ways of agriculture, and keeping climate migrants out of their country, those who think it's a hoax may think again.
What are some famous hoaxes related to Global Warming?
Although many famous people have been quoted as saying that the entire idea of global warming is a hoax, there are no real specifics. Sometimes, newspapers print April Fools articles claiming that fruit is growing in an unusual shape of colour, but these are very light hearted claims.
How do views on the causes of global warming differ among scientists and people?
Among average people, most believe global warming is real and manmade, some believe it is a hoax created by the green energy industry and environmentalists, and a few think it is real, but not caused by us. The statistics prove it is real. I am personally quite sure that any climate scientist who claims global warming is not real or not caused by the burning of fossil fuels is lying on behalf of the companies who sell fossil fuels.
How is the government getting money from the global warming hoax?
Oh honey, the government isn't making money from a "global warming hoax." They're actually funding initiatives to combat climate change and protect the environment. So, if you're looking for a conspiracy theory, you'll have to search elsewhere because this one's as dry as last week's toast.
Is greenhouse effect is the other name of global warming?
Strictly speaking there is no other name for global warming."The whole earth heating up" might be another name.Global warming is causing climate change, so many people think they are both the same, so they say:"Climate change is another name for global warming", but they are not really the same.
Is gloabl warming real?
# global warmin is a big hoax created by scientists and the gouvernment. and if littering is a big deal then littler pickers should tudy up, that is what they get payed for.
Why are reporters saying that global warming is a hoax?
Because the media is owned and operated by private interest that want to continue selling products that harm you and the environment without you worrying about it.
How is Global Warming a Scam?
The science of global warming could be a scam if someone had anything to gain by it. Yet scientists resisted the idea that they should be concerned about the possibility for almost a century after the possibility of anthropogenic global warming was first identified. No scientist has anything to gain by creating a hoax. In fact, any evidence that a research scientist has engaged in a scam would be career-destroying.
How much money do people make and using what off the global warming hoax?
The only people making money off "the global warming hoax" are the non-scientific naysayers that seek to conflate science with wishful thinking, constructing specious arguments using (at best) carefully selected facts taken out of context, and posting stupid questions like this. When 98% of the entire world's climatologists agree that (i) climate change is real; (ii) it is being accelerated by human introduction of increased concentrations of CO2 in the atmosphere; and (iii) peer-reviewed experiments validating human-influenced climate change are easily replicated, then that's not a hoax - its science. [Nope, I didn't make a penny for writing this answer.]
