Nuclear energy has both advantages and disadvantages, therefore I would say that it is a bit of both; we could describe it as a mixed blessing. From an environmental perspective, nuclear energy could be a major tool in combatting global warming, because it does not emit greenhouse gases, and therefore it can replace other energy sources such as coal burning power plants that do emit greenhouse gases. However, there are other energy sources such as solar power which are even more environmentally sound, so in the end, we may phase out nuclear power, if we can get our act together. Nuclear waste, and the potential for catastrophic nuclear accidents, remain real concerns.
As far as I know there is no question of a ban. If nuclear is not used then coal will have to be increased.
friction is 99% boon because you can't imagine a world without it. without friction, you cannot write on paper as the ink will not stick to paper. if you kick a ball, it will never come to rest. you cannot walk without it and so on. it is 1% bane because at times, it causes hindrances in machinery which produces a lot of heating effect.
If it is stored in the nucleus, it must be nuclear energy.
Yes, nuclear energy is energy.
Nuclear energy and renewable energy are not related. Renewable energy does not use nuclear energy.
i think it is a boon as well as bane
So far nuclear energy should be called bane. The waste disposal problems and reactor accidents outweigh its lack of emissions.
boon boon
what is bane or boon
50%boon and 50% bane
technology is bane to me but to the world is boon
Scoring rubrics is a boon, not a bane. A boon is something helpful, while a bane is something harmful.
Strengthing of rupee boon or bane?"
It can be both a blessing (boon) and a curse (bane).
fashion shows a boon or a bane
it is a boon.
boon