As per the website, www.acronymfinder.com, OOPS stands for Object-Oriented Programming and Systems.
Regards,
Anthony
anthonymail@rediffmail.com
the extra s stands for system. Object Oriented Program System
Plurality or multiplicity are indicated by the 's' at the end of a word in the English language.
Personal opinion. It can't. Crap code is crap in object oriented or otherwise. Great code is great code object oriented or otherwise. Maintainable code is maintainable even if it's written in clear, well documented procedural assembly language. Second opinion if the first wasn't any good : Since all university students are taught object oriented programming these days and ALL modern programming languages that have documentation worth reading are object oriented, it means that the alternatives are simply harder to find people who can program anymore. Third answer that you can write on your homework assignment after reading it here instead of reading it in the book the teacher made you buy and assigned you a chapter to read from. This way you can plagiarize this answer instead of having to read and formulate your own answer by actually understanding what you've read :) Object oriented programming allows the creation of individual source code entities that while theoretically can be reused or extended without rewriting large portions of code, are generally more useful for containing code in modules which are easier to understand than is the case in procedural programming where code is often structured like spaghetti on a larger scale. For extra credit. Object oriented code when structured like spaghetti is generally easier to detangle than procedural spaghetti as dependencies are typically consolidated to within an object as opposed to spread across the entire project.
C++ allows you to mix object oriented programming with generic programming and C-style programming. C has none of these features. C-style programming and C programming are broadly similar, with only minor differences, most of which are irrelevant. As such, it is very rarely necessary to use a lower-level language than C++. The static type system in C is inherently weak; filled with loopholes and inconsistencies. C++ is much more robust by comparison.
Nothing.
megatron, nbe 1 stands for non biological extra terrestrial.
In answer to your question the acronym 'ESVC' stands for Extra Strength Vitrified Clay. Hope this helps -Dan
Personal opinion. It can't. Crap code is crap in object oriented or otherwise. Great code is great code object oriented or otherwise. Maintainable code is maintainable even if it's written in clear, well documented procedural assembly language. Second opinion if the first wasn't any good : Since all university students are taught object oriented programming these days and ALL modern programming languages that have documentation worth reading are object oriented, it means that the alternatives are simply harder to find people who can program anymore. Third answer that you can write on your homework assignment after reading it here instead of reading it in the book the teacher made you buy and assigned you a chapter to read from. This way you can plagiarize this answer instead of having to read and formulate your own answer by actually understanding what you've read :) Object oriented programming allows the creation of individual source code entities that while theoretically can be reused or extended without rewriting large portions of code, are generally more useful for containing code in modules which are easier to understand than is the case in procedural programming where code is often structured like spaghetti on a larger scale. For extra credit. Object oriented code when structured like spaghetti is generally easier to detangle than procedural spaghetti as dependencies are typically consolidated to within an object as opposed to spread across the entire project.
Charge is the measure of extra positive or negative particles an object has.
C++ allows you to mix object oriented programming with generic programming and C-style programming. C has none of these features. C-style programming and C programming are broadly similar, with only minor differences, most of which are irrelevant. As such, it is very rarely necessary to use a lower-level language than C++. The static type system in C is inherently weak; filled with loopholes and inconsistencies. C++ is much more robust by comparison.
Nothing.
It is a Spanish size which stands for extra grande and means extra large
XL stands for eXtra Large while XL stands for eXtra Large and Tall. Therefore 2XL means eXtra eXtra large (XXL or 2Xl) and eXtra eXtra large and tall (XXLT or 2XlT). The difference in these two sizes are the height of the shirt, 2XLT is taller than 2XL.
SETI stands for Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence
The XD stands for eXtra Dimension... I think.
The XL stands for 'eXtra Large'.
the abbreviation Sxi stands for Sports Extra Injection
XL stands for extra large lens
Yes, many basic cable packages offer on-demand programming. However, there is an extra fee associated with this if you only have basic cable.