0
Why didn't your accountant file your quarterly estimated taxes on time?
What else can I help you with?
What might have happened if Gauls attack on Rome in 387 BC had failed?
The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. Everyone will have a different answer. Read your history book and come up with your own ideas on it.The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. Everyone will have a different answer. Read your history book and come up with your own ideas on it.The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. Everyone will have a different answer. Read your history book and come up with your own ideas on it.The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. Everyone will have a different answer. Read your history book and come up with your own ideas on it.The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. Everyone will have a different answer. Read your history book and come up with your own ideas on it.The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. Everyone will have a different answer. Read your history book and come up with your own ideas on it.The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. Everyone will have a different answer. Read your history book and come up with your own ideas on it.The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. Everyone will have a different answer. Read your history book and come up with your own ideas on it.The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. Everyone will have a different answer. Read your history book and come up with your own ideas on it.
What do you think would have happened to rome if the barbarians and other invaders left it alone?
Your question cannot be answered factually because it calls for speculation. Many things could have happened, but its all guesswork and a solid answer is unavailable.Your question cannot be answered factually because it calls for speculation. Many things could have happened, but its all guesswork and a solid answer is unavailable.Your question cannot be answered factually because it calls for speculation. Many things could have happened, but its all guesswork and a solid answer is unavailable.Your question cannot be answered factually because it calls for speculation. Many things could have happened, but its all guesswork and a solid answer is unavailable.Your question cannot be answered factually because it calls for speculation. Many things could have happened, but its all guesswork and a solid answer is unavailable.Your question cannot be answered factually because it calls for speculation. Many things could have happened, but its all guesswork and a solid answer is unavailable.Your question cannot be answered factually because it calls for speculation. Many things could have happened, but its all guesswork and a solid answer is unavailable.Your question cannot be answered factually because it calls for speculation. Many things could have happened, but its all guesswork and a solid answer is unavailable.Your question cannot be answered factually because it calls for speculation. Many things could have happened, but its all guesswork and a solid answer is unavailable.
Objection: Calls for a physical performance.?
Now I want you to stretch your arms over your head and straighten them out as much as possible.
What have happen if the roman nobels had not overthrown their last king?
Your question cannot be answered properly because it calls for speculation, not fact. Roman history certainly would have been different, that's about all that can be said.Your question cannot be answered properly because it calls for speculation, not fact. Roman history certainly would have been different, that's about all that can be said.Your question cannot be answered properly because it calls for speculation, not fact. Roman history certainly would have been different, that's about all that can be said.Your question cannot be answered properly because it calls for speculation, not fact. Roman history certainly would have been different, that's about all that can be said.Your question cannot be answered properly because it calls for speculation, not fact. Roman history certainly would have been different, that's about all that can be said.Your question cannot be answered properly because it calls for speculation, not fact. Roman history certainly would have been different, that's about all that can be said.Your question cannot be answered properly because it calls for speculation, not fact. Roman history certainly would have been different, that's about all that can be said.Your question cannot be answered properly because it calls for speculation, not fact. Roman history certainly would have been different, that's about all that can be said.Your question cannot be answered properly because it calls for speculation, not fact. Roman history certainly would have been different, that's about all that can be said.
Objection: calls for a legal opinion.?
What do you mean when you claim in your verified complaint that your injuries were proximately caused by my client, the defendant's, negligent actions?
How would ancient rome have been different if Julius Caesar didn't existed?
Your question can't be answered because it calls for personal speculation. Any answer given could not possibly be backed up with facts because it would be a personal opinion.Your question can't be answered because it calls for personal speculation. Any answer given could not possibly be backed up with facts because it would be a personal opinion.Your question can't be answered because it calls for personal speculation. Any answer given could not possibly be backed up with facts because it would be a personal opinion.Your question can't be answered because it calls for personal speculation. Any answer given could not possibly be backed up with facts because it would be a personal opinion.Your question can't be answered because it calls for personal speculation. Any answer given could not possibly be backed up with facts because it would be a personal opinion.Your question can't be answered because it calls for personal speculation. Any answer given could not possibly be backed up with facts because it would be a personal opinion.Your question can't be answered because it calls for personal speculation. Any answer given could not possibly be backed up with facts because it would be a personal opinion.Your question can't be answered because it calls for personal speculation. Any answer given could not possibly be backed up with facts because it would be a personal opinion.Your question can't be answered because it calls for personal speculation. Any answer given could not possibly be backed up with facts because it would be a personal opinion.
What if Carthage defeated Rome?
Your question cannot be answered properly because the answer calls for speculation, not fact. The only "factoid" would be that there would have probably been no Roman empire and we would have a different heritage.Your question cannot be answered properly because the answer calls for speculation, not fact. The only "factoid" would be that there would have probably been no Roman empire and we would have a different heritage.Your question cannot be answered properly because the answer calls for speculation, not fact. The only "factoid" would be that there would have probably been no Roman empire and we would have a different heritage.Your question cannot be answered properly because the answer calls for speculation, not fact. The only "factoid" would be that there would have probably been no Roman empire and we would have a different heritage.Your question cannot be answered properly because the answer calls for speculation, not fact. The only "factoid" would be that there would have probably been no Roman empire and we would have a different heritage.Your question cannot be answered properly because the answer calls for speculation, not fact. The only "factoid" would be that there would have probably been no Roman empire and we would have a different heritage.Your question cannot be answered properly because the answer calls for speculation, not fact. The only "factoid" would be that there would have probably been no Roman empire and we would have a different heritage.Your question cannot be answered properly because the answer calls for speculation, not fact. The only "factoid" would be that there would have probably been no Roman empire and we would have a different heritage.Your question cannot be answered properly because the answer calls for speculation, not fact. The only "factoid" would be that there would have probably been no Roman empire and we would have a different heritage.
What would have happened if rome never had conquered Egypt?
The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.The answer to your question calls for speculation, not fact. You can get a hundred views on the subject, but none of them would be correct because the event you are asking about did not happen.
Why are police officers at colleges and universities motivated to under report or over report crime?
Question calls for speculation on the motives of other persons and calls for an unverifiable opinion which is NOT THE PURPOSE of WikiANswers
Objection: Calls for expert opinion opinion.?
How long would the phagocyotic process continue after the introduction of bio-active colloidal silver to the cancerous cell culture?
What might have happened if brutus had listened to Cassius and killed anTONY?
You question can't be answered factually, because it calls for an opinion or speculation.
What is the suffix for the word objection?
I have an objection to the vagueness of your "question."
