Want this question answered?
No, the unaffected species would not evolve. Why?Becauseit is neither helped nor harmed, so it is /unaffected/. It's like it doesn't even realize it's happening.
There is no organism that is harmed in commensalism. Commensalism refers to the class of relationship between two organisms whereby one benefits while the other one is neutral.
Mutualism is a symbiotic relationship in which both species benefit.In other words, two species help each other out. Note that neither species is harmed in the relationship.The usual example is: Sea anemones protect clownfish from predators, and the clownfish defend the anemones from butterflyfish.
No that would be commensalism! Mutualism is when two orgasms both benefit from each other
Competition, represented in shorthand by two minus signs (--) Other interactions: Predation/parasitism (+-) Commensalism (+O) Mutualism (++)
one species wins and the other isn't harmed or helped one species wins and the other isn't harmed or helped
commensalism
One species benefits and other is harmed
A relationship where one organism is benefited and the other is harmed is calledPARASITISM
A relationship where one organism is benefited and the other is harmed is calledPARASITISM
That is called commensalism.
symbiotic
Predation or parasitism. One species benefits whilst the other is disadvantaged
There are three possibilities: 1. Both benefit 2. Parasite benefits, host gets harmed 3. No effect: both are neutral
No, the unaffected species would not evolve. Why?Becauseit is neither helped nor harmed, so it is /unaffected/. It's like it doesn't even realize it's happening.
There is no organism that is harmed in commensalism. Commensalism refers to the class of relationship between two organisms whereby one benefits while the other one is neutral.
It's called a parasitic relationship when one species benefits and one species is harmed. A simbiotic relationship is when both species benefit.