I would agree that the answer is probably yes.
They are said to limit judges in the use of their own discretion in sentencing.
The legislature(s) introduced mandatory sentencing in an effort to make sentencing more equal for the same offenses, and to thwart lenient sentences by 'bleeding heart' judges.
true .
Some judges complain that it takes their discretion to handle the length and type of sentencing away from them. Added: They require incarceration for minor offenses they're too detailed and cumbersome to apply
Indeterminate Indeterminate sentencing relies heavily on judges' discretion to choose among types of sanctions and to set upper and lower limits on the length of prison stays.
They are referred to a Mandatory Sentencing Laws. The state legislatures of various states have passed certain laws in which the law itself states what the exact penalty will be if the defendant is convicted. Judges have no sentencing discretion in these cases at all.
Indeterminate Indeterminate sentencing relies heavily on judges' discretion to choose among types of sanctions and to set upper and lower limits on the length of prison stays.
Victim and Witness Protection Act
Victim and Witness Protection Act (VWPA)
the judiciary act of 1801
I am unaware of any such law. A judge is free to sentence immediately upon the pronouncement of the verdict or he may order a pre-sentencing report to assist him in making a decision, and delay the sentencing hearing until the report is prepared and submitted to him.
Victim and Witness Protection Act (VWPA)