Very good question, the book 'Planet Under Pressure: Population' would answer all your questions, but here's a quick answer
China, actually limited only one baby per family, then for every baby there would be -1 to the population. the USA might wanna think about that, and would thank you for your concern.
answer 2 Another possibility is that many folk have an inadequate measure of self worth. The only way they can be assured of being remembered is by having children. It is conspicuous that as folk get wealthier (in general ) the fewer children they have. Albert seemed to get by with the one child, produced in early life.
Also, practice the Three R's : reduce, reuse and recycle!
By getting resources from the rainforest and not planting the trees back.
Global warming, also known that the sun is melting them. sense we are being pulled toward the sun, the earth is getting warmer.
Run it under cold water. Try getting it to be cold. Since particles extract when warm causing the rubber to become soft.
well a p0138 is an o2 sensor problem and as for the P0455 the evap system has a very large leak over 40 microns and it may need a fuel cap the P0442 and the P0455 usually go together one is the cause of another
They are destructive because the ash can harm people by getting into their lungs and causing health problems and they also damage houses and it can also destroy property and crops.but it can also enrich the soil.
Coastal overpopulation means1. Less fish in the sea 2.Less beaches for getting a suntan. 3.More work for lifeguards.
Contraseptives and exponential birthrates can be two reasons for overpopulation
Egypt is overpopulated like any 3rd world, because an average Egyptian family has 7 kids. The reason for this is because simple education is not excisable and since there is no social security, having a big family is there own made social security. This is all thanks to Nasser and Arab Socialism.
Overpopulation is a problem because when there are too many people on earth or in one area the resources start to run out and waste production increases and lots of times the economy in these areas go down because there are just so many people to care for. Babies being born needs to stop for a while.The earths climate is changing because of CO2 in the air is bringing in more rays from the sun, but they can't come out. They are being trapped and the earth is getting warmer. CO2 mainly is produced from biomass energy and the use of fossil fuels. We all need to work together and use more efficient energy sources and stop taking from the earth. Limit your usage of driving and burning gases.So many people drive instead of transporting in a healthier way that there is so much CO2 being made. The earth's overpopulation always leads from one subject to another, there are many causes and effects of everything. WE NEED TO STOP! Well, there are different problems of overpopulation such as:- - Global Warming, - Infant fertility rate, - Destruction of tree
The concerns with overpopulation is that there are getting to be too many people for each of us: * to get enough resources to llve our lives free of hunger and disease * to have the energy to manufacture goods and keep warm * to have places to live, water to drink, social amenities like schools and hospitals * to haver all our waste treated. The answer to overpopulation is to maintain the number of people to the point that there is enough of a population to create the social and lifestyle conditions we want, but not so many that the resources cannot meet their needs That gets us to the biggest problem with finding or enacting a solution: Overpopulation is a problem usually expressed as there being too many of "them". "We" are okay. As a consequence, there is a tendency for the answers to overpopulation to be met with the same responses as the proposals for control of global warming: * There is no problem. * Why should "we" put ourselves out when "they" are just going to eat up any improvement we make. * We're okay, let "them" solve their own problems. * We will eventually solve the problem without population control by developing new technical answers * It's too big to tackle. Observations of nature suggest that the problem of overpopulation will eventually sort itself out. When any population gets too big, it suffers from a massive die off due to disease or social stress. In the case of human beings we could add war to the list. This could get messy as these solutions will impact everybody, not just "them". Also there is a tendency for natural or uncontrolled solutions to over-correct the problem. Instead of our present several billion folks we could end up with a few hundred thousand - enough to breed and continue the species, but not enough to continue the civilization or the technology. So what can we do? As individuals, very little. As individual countries, not much more. As a majority of the human race maybe. We'd have to agree to: * Work together for a solution. * Share what we have until we get to the solution. * Abide by the solution after it is available. The "solution" is the hard part. Writers of science fiction have come up with many, but none seem overly pleasant. Controlling birth by universal birth control, licensing or social pressure is often mentioned. Reducing medical care for the infirm is a potential solution that flies in the face of humanitarians. Some writers even suggest making life or death lottery choices a routine event.
The concerns with overpopulation is that there are getting to be too many people for each of us to get enough resources to live our lives free of hunger and disease. To have the energy to manufacture goods and keep warm. To have places to live, water to drink, social amenities like schols and hospitals. To many of us for all our waste to be treated. The answer to overpopulation is to maintain the number of people to the point that there is enough of a population to create the social and lifestyle conditions we want, but not so many that the resources cannot meet their needs That gets us to the biggest problem with finding or enacting a solution: Overpopulation is a problem usually expressed as there being too many of "them". "We" are okay. As a consequence all of the answers to overpopulation are met with the same responses as the proposals for control of global warming: * There is no problem. * Why should "we" put ourselves out when "they" are just going to eat up any improvement we make. * We're okay, let "them" solve their own problems. * We will eventually solve the problem without population control by developing new technical answers * It's too big to tackle. Observations of nature suggest that the problem of overpopulation will eventually sort itself out. When any population gets too big it suffers from a massive die off due to disease or social stress. In the case of human beings we could add war to the list. This could get messy as these solutions will impact everybody, not just "them". Also there is a tendency for natural or uncontrolled solutions to over-correct the problem. Instead of our present several billion folks we could end up with a few hundred thousand - enough to breed and continue the species, but not enough to continue the civilization or the technology. So what can we do? As individuals, very little. As individual countries, not much more. As a majority of the human race maybe. We'd have to agree to: * Work together for a solution. * Share what we have until we get to the solution. * Abide by the solution after it is available. The"solution" is the hard part. Writers of science fiction have come up with man, but none seem overly pleasant. Controlling birth by universal birth control, licensing or social pressure is often mentioned. Reducing medical care for the infirm is a potential solution that flies in the face of humanitarians. Some writers even suggest making life or death lottery choices a routine event
poor because if there is more people they will be getting money from selling goods.also if there is more people it makes them poorer because you will have to spend money on many people in the slums and everywhere else alos ifany war happens then they will have to spend they money on guns and armour rather than spending they money on hospitals and schools.
Overpopulation.
The concerns with overpopulation is that there are getting to be too many people for each of us to get enough resources to live our lives free of hunger and disease. To have the energy to manufacture goods and keep warm. To have places to live, water to drink, social amenities like schools and hospitals. To many of us for all our waste to be treated.The answer to overpopulation is to maintain the number of people to the point that there is enough of a population to create the social ad lifestyle conditions we want, but not so many that the resources cannot meet their needsThat gets us to the biggest problem with finding or enacting a solution:Overpopulation is a problem usually expressed as there being too many of "them". "We" are okay.As a consequence all of the answers to overpopulation are met with the same responses as the proposals for control of global warming:There is no problem.Why should "we" put ourselves out when "they" are just going to eat up any improvement we make.We're okay, let "them" solve their own problems.We will eventually solve the problem without population control by developing new technical answersIt's too big to tackleObservations of nature suggest that the problem of overpopulation will eventually sort itself out. When any population gets too big it suffers from a massive die off due to disease or social stress. In the case of human beings we could add war to the list. This could get messy as these solutions will impact everybody, not just "them". Also there is a tendency for natural or uncontrolled solutions to over-correct the problem. Instead of our present several billion folks we could end up with a few hundred thousand - enough to breed and continue the species, but not enough to continue the civilization or the technology.So what can we do? As individuals, very little. As individual countries, not much more. As a majority of the human race maybe.We'd have to agree to:Work together for a solution.Share what we have until we get to the solution.Abide by the solution after it is available.The "solution" is the hard part. Writers of Science Fiction have come up with man, but none seem overly pleasant. Controlling birth by universal Birth Control, licensing or social pressure is often mentioned. Reducing medical care for the infirm is a potential solution that flies in the face of humanitarians. Some writers even suggest making life or death lottery choices a routine event.
The concerns with overpopulation is that there are getting to be too many people for each of us to get enough resources to live our lives free of hunger and disease. To have the energy to manufacture goods and keep warm. To have places to live, water to drink, social amenities like schols and hospitals. To many of us for all our waste to be treated. The answer to overpopulation is to maintain the number of people to the point that there is enough of a population to create the social and lifestyle conditions we want, but not so many that the resources cannot meet their needs That gets us to the biggest problem with finding or enacting a solution: Overpopulation is a problem usually expressed as there being too many of "them". "We" are okay. As a consequence all of the answers to overpopulation are met with the same responses as the proposals for control of global warming: * There is no problem. * Why should "we" put ourselves out when "they" are just going to eat up any improvement we make. * We're okay, let "them" solve their own problems. * We will eventually solve the problem without population control by developing new technical answers * It's too big to tackle. Observations of nature suggest that the problem of overpopulation will eventually sort itself out. When any population gets too big it suffers from a massive die off due to disease or social stress. In the case of human beings we could add war to the list. This could get messy as these solutions will impact everybody, not just "them". Also there is a tendency for natural or uncontrolled solutions to over-correct the problem. Instead of our present several billion folks we could end up with a few hundred thousand - enough to breed and continue the species, but not enough to continue the civilization or the technology. So what can we do? As individuals, very little. As individual countries, not much more. As a majority of the human race maybe. We'd have to agree to: * Work together for a solution. * Share what we have until we get to the solution. * Abide by the solution after it is available. The"solution" is the hard part. Writers of science fiction have come up with man, but none seem overly pleasant. Controlling birth by universal birth control, licensing or social pressure is often mentioned. Reducing medical care for the infirm is a potential solution that flies in the face of humanitarians. Some writers even suggest making life or death lottery choices a routine event
They usually pay fines. Except for state officials. They lose their job automatically.
The basic cause for overpopulation is illiteracy. In most of rural areas people think the more the children they will have the more will be their working hands. But thats not true, just think who will give them food. So we need to eradicate illiteracy first.