answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

the second estate

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Owned land but held little real power?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Who was the person that owned land but held little real power?

There are many people who have owned land, but did not have much power. More information is needed to know which person would be the correct answer.


Did the Clergy own land but hold little real power?

no, the third estate owned land but had very little power. The third estate are peasants and works.


Who held the power under feudalism?

Kings and lords owned the land and peasants called serfs, so lords and kings had all the power.


What does this mean have you ever held an interest in residential land?

Owned property.


Who owned the land where the Quidditch World Cup was held?

The Ministry of Magic owns the land where the Quidditch World Cup was placed.


Who were the landlords in china?

In China, landlords were typically wealthy landowners who owned large amounts of land and rented it out to tenant farmers. They often held significant power and influence over the peasants who worked the land, leading to social and economic inequalities. Land reform policies were implemented by the Chinese government to address these disparities.


What was the class structure of Old English society?

Old English society was structured into three main classes: the nobility, the clergy, and the common people. The nobility included kings, earls, and thegns who owned land and had political power. The clergy consisted of monks, priests, and bishops who held religious authority. The common people, or peasants, were farmers and laborers who worked the land owned by the nobility.


How much of the land did the Church own during the middle ages?

In some countries, the king technically owned the entire country, with the possible exception of lands owned by the Church. Lords, knights, and country gentlemen all held their lands either directly or indirectly from the king, in exchange for support and promises of loyalty. In some other countries, the kings controlled nearly nothing, or their might not have been a king at all. King Childeric III of the Franks might have owned something, in terms of legalities, but he had no power at all and could not even decide his own fate. Venice, on the other hand, was founded as a republic, and never had a king.


What Land is owned by France and urgel?

The land owned by France and Urgel is Andorra.


Was Alaska's land was once owned by Russia?

yes Alaska's land was once owned by Russia. yes Alaska's land was once owned by Russia.


Why was the land ownership so important to the colonists?

Land ownership in England was not available to most people at the time that the colonies were being settled. Most of the land was in the hands of those who held hereditary titles under the Crown.


How did the roles of patricians and plebeians differ roman society?

At the beginning of the city the roles of the patricians and plebeians were clearly defined. The patricians were the landowners and they accrued all the wealth that the land provided and their wealth brought them power. The plebeians, at this time, were the working class. They owned little or no land and were powerless. However over the years things changed. The plebeians gained their civil rights and in time were also wealthy and gained power. By the mid to late republic one consul had to be a plebeian.At the beginning of the city the roles of the patricians and plebeians were clearly defined. The patricians were the landowners and they accrued all the wealth that the land provided and their wealth brought them power. The plebeians, at this time, were the working class. They owned little or no land and were powerless. However over the years things changed. The plebeians gained their civil rights and in time were also wealthy and gained power. By the mid to late republic one consul had to be a plebeian.At the beginning of the city the roles of the patricians and plebeians were clearly defined. The patricians were the landowners and they accrued all the wealth that the land provided and their wealth brought them power. The plebeians, at this time, were the working class. They owned little or no land and were powerless. However over the years things changed. The plebeians gained their civil rights and in time were also wealthy and gained power. By the mid to late republic one consul had to be a plebeian.At the beginning of the city the roles of the patricians and plebeians were clearly defined. The patricians were the landowners and they accrued all the wealth that the land provided and their wealth brought them power. The plebeians, at this time, were the working class. They owned little or no land and were powerless. However over the years things changed. The plebeians gained their civil rights and in time were also wealthy and gained power. By the mid to late republic one consul had to be a plebeian.At the beginning of the city the roles of the patricians and plebeians were clearly defined. The patricians were the landowners and they accrued all the wealth that the land provided and their wealth brought them power. The plebeians, at this time, were the working class. They owned little or no land and were powerless. However over the years things changed. The plebeians gained their civil rights and in time were also wealthy and gained power. By the mid to late republic one consul had to be a plebeian.At the beginning of the city the roles of the patricians and plebeians were clearly defined. The patricians were the landowners and they accrued all the wealth that the land provided and their wealth brought them power. The plebeians, at this time, were the working class. They owned little or no land and were powerless. However over the years things changed. The plebeians gained their civil rights and in time were also wealthy and gained power. By the mid to late republic one consul had to be a plebeian.At the beginning of the city the roles of the patricians and plebeians were clearly defined. The patricians were the landowners and they accrued all the wealth that the land provided and their wealth brought them power. The plebeians, at this time, were the working class. They owned little or no land and were powerless. However over the years things changed. The plebeians gained their civil rights and in time were also wealthy and gained power. By the mid to late republic one consul had to be a plebeian.At the beginning of the city the roles of the patricians and plebeians were clearly defined. The patricians were the landowners and they accrued all the wealth that the land provided and their wealth brought them power. The plebeians, at this time, were the working class. They owned little or no land and were powerless. However over the years things changed. The plebeians gained their civil rights and in time were also wealthy and gained power. By the mid to late republic one consul had to be a plebeian.At the beginning of the city the roles of the patricians and plebeians were clearly defined. The patricians were the landowners and they accrued all the wealth that the land provided and their wealth brought them power. The plebeians, at this time, were the working class. They owned little or no land and were powerless. However over the years things changed. The plebeians gained their civil rights and in time were also wealthy and gained power. By the mid to late republic one consul had to be a plebeian.