Only when it affects no one else. That includes the people who have to pay for your doctor bills and nurse you when you get sick from it.
Society (communism) verses the individual (freedom). What's more important, the individual person's right to do what he wants (smoke a cigar for example) or societies safety with his second hand smoke?
Belive it or not some of them still do. The worse thing about it is that some of them think that they have the right to smoke around outher people, who don't want their smoke. People who have to smoke should at least take it outside.
because it is not right and not good for people who smoke.
The ethical discussion that is normally at the center of smoking relates to how can people be sufficiently protected from second hand smoke while still allowing smokers to have individual liberties. As exposure to second hand smoke can be just as deadly as smoking, smoker's rights usually fall by the wayside.
The smoke releases deadly chemicals into the air, including carbon monoxide. Inhaling just the right amount of smoke can be lethal.
Social freedom is the concept philosophers, political scientists, and also economists are often concerned with - often without realizing it - when dealing with the subject of liberty. An example of social freedom is people can smoke tobacco in a bar if the bad permits it, the bar has the right to choose whether or not to permit it.
Don't smoke or be around people who smoke, exercise like going for a run at least twice a week and eating right. Do all of these and hopefuly you will be fine.
Tj
Rich people smoke for the same reason poor and middle class people smoke, because they want to.
There is no average income for those who smoke, you have a wide range of people who smoke, from the president, to unemployed people
People that smoke "weed" don't smoke it for the smell of the smoke, they smoke it for the effect it has on them.
around 500000000 people smoke a day