0
Potentially, yes.
Most views of socialism hold that most enterprise will be publicly-owned or collectively-owned by their worker-members, but there would still be a role for private enterprise especially in small-scale distribution and production. Eventually, as socialism develops, there would no longer be a need for the emergence of small private enterprise as most needs and desires will be able to be met by collective and public production units.
Communism, in Marxist theory, is a final stage of development where all the means of production are held in common.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Does Private enterprise have a greater role in socialism than in communism?
YES
Does the USS Enterprise have a greater height than the Oasis of the Seas?
The USS Enterprise (NCC-1701D) is 72 meters in height and the Oasis Queen of the Seas is 65 meters high. Therefore the USS Enterprise is of a greater height.
What is the primary criticism against socialism?
The primary criticism against socialism is that it stifles the motivation to innovate since it provides welfare to the impoverished and imposes greater taxes on the wealthy.
Who had the greater impact on Russia and the Russian people Lenin or Stalin?
They both had great impacts on Russia. Lenin played a part that wanted to have everyone equal when Stalin tricked people to get in control. Stalin got to power and dictated, Lenin was a revolutionary who believed in communism. Stalin wanted socialism.
Isn't spreading the wealth Marxism aka Communism If so doesn't that mean we are about to elect Barack Obama an actual communist?
Actually it is more Socialism, however there are many Social Democracies--primarily in Northern Europe--that combine some aspects of socialism and democratism. Interestingly, those countries often have a greater level of satisfaction with the government by their populace, children that are better educated, longer lifespans, and people who are generally happier. Doesn't sound so bad.
What are the benefits of industrial capitalism?
It creates the prerequisites for it's overthrow and the establishment of socialism. With capitalism ineviably comes, greater wealth than under feudalism and great technological advacement. These are just two prerequisites for the establishment of socialism at least.
Who believed the rise of communism in Russia and Eastern Europe was a far greater threat to the world than the defeat of Germany?
No one believed the rise of communism was a greater threat than Germany during WWII. Western Europe was allied with communist Russia during WWII, so they did not wish to destroy their ally. It wasn't until after WWII that fear shifted to the rise of communism, as communism spread all over Eastern Europe and even divided Germany.
What kind of values does Communism have?
Communism divides people into haves (governing), and have nots (workers). It is a highly restrictive form of government that does not promote equality nor liberty as many see or wish it to have. It is a totalitarian doctrine that puts the greater portion of a society into submission for purposes of control ensuring order, but at the cost of creative thought and problem solving. Its cost also include the loss of personal liberty, property ownership, individuality, choice, and freedom of speech. Socialism is a step down, though not much better as it also shares some of the same costs, but is less restrictive than communism.
What type of economic system does monarchy have?
A Monarchy is a system of government and not necessarily an economic system. The United Kingdom is a monarchy but it has a capitalist system of economics moderated by some socialism aspects. Health care is operated by the government as a socialist system wherein the medical providers are employees of the government and all payments are made via taxes, although some set fees may be involved on a case by case basis. Contrast this with the French medical care system where the government provides health insurance, paid for by taxes, that covers 80 percent of all health costs and the citizens must either pay the balance or buy supplementary insurance to cover it. The medical providers are private enterprises (capitalism). In the UK the post office is operated by the government and, like the US, there are private enterprise delivery services in competition with the government. The UK is a constitutional monarchy (but, without a written constitution!) and Parliament is elected. The Prime Minister is appointed by the majority party. The monarchy has little real power. Contrast this with North Korea, which is a communist state where the government owns and operates all economic activities. There is no private ownership of any business or home and everyone is paid by the government. Yet, leadership is and has been handed down from father to son in every respect as though it was a monarchy. You need to separate the structure of government from the structure of the economy. There are many mixes in different nations and the claims of socialism, monarchy, and communism are quite misused in the political battles of the USA. China and Vietnam are communist nations at the government level yet both have been allowing capitalism to take place in their economies to a greater or lesser extent. Socialism is quite different from communism and the pleasant nations of Norway (monarchy) and Sweden (not a monarchy) have a strong mix of socialism and capitalism within their economies.
Is Goodmayes Rd Ilford Greater London IG3 a private road?
No it is not.
What is subsidiories?
An enterprise controlled by another (called the parent) through the ownership of greater than 50 percent of its voting stock
Explain why increasing the lifetime value of a customer is an inexpensive way to secure the future of an enterprise and the four ways to do this?
greater financial growth, with respect to profits, greater likleyhood of long term buisness success
