Scientists' published work is not supposed to be published until another scientist working in the same field has been through it and checked it errors of all kinds. There are many ways in which this basic checking procedure can be circumvented or avoided altogether.
No. Quality and accuracy are incredibly important to scientists. If an experiment is not performed with quality and accuracy it is not valid. However, if accuracy is not especially important, possibly because the result will be the same, then it can be ignored.
There are two categories of scientific observations, Quantitative and Qualitative.The definitions of these two types of observations can be derived from their names.Qualitative: The base word is Quality. Observations can be made about the qualities of different items, i.e., leaves are green, birds can fly, water is clear.Quantitative: The base word is Quantity. Something you can measure or count i.e., a tree has 1000 leaves, birds have two wings, water has a density of ~1000 kilograms per cubic meter.
Peer review in scientific journals refers to the process where experts in the field evaluate and assess the quality and validity of a research article before it is published. The manuscript is sent to other scientists who review the methodology, analysis, and conclusions of the study. This process helps ensure that only high-quality and credible research gets published.
The word 'quality' is both and adjective and a noun.Examples:It's a good investment to own at least one pair of quality shoes. (adjective)His best quality is his honesty. (noun)
Process quality is critical since it relates directly to the reliability of the product
quatitative observations have to do with QUANTITY and qualitative observations have to do with QUALITY.
Taste and smell are two of the best tests to determine the quality of a product. These senses are well developed and can often give a better understanding of the problem than a laboratory test.
scientists did
Multi-medium observations of quality Or preferably, Mickey Mouse on Quaaludes
scientists did
No. Quality and accuracy are incredibly important to scientists. If an experiment is not performed with quality and accuracy it is not valid. However, if accuracy is not especially important, possibly because the result will be the same, then it can be ignored.
Quantitative observations are those which can be measured and/or calculated and expressed in numbers.Example: When you weigh something, you get a measurement which indicates the quantity, rather than quality. You can say that a woman weighs 60 kilos, that is a quantitative observation. Saying that she is beautiful is a qualitative observation, "she has the quality of beauty." Also, quantitative observations are objective while qualitative observations may be subjective. To a colour blind person, a rose may be grey, but put it on a scale and it weighs the same for him as it does for a person with normal colour perception.
High levels of nitrates.
survey
If you are talking about water quality, there are a few ways.First: Remote SensingThis can include anything from satellites to SONAR, which records and sends data to the scientists remotely.Second: Ground TruthingGround truthingis the more accurate method of water quality testing, in which scientists use chemical tests or probes in a water source to check vital water quality levels like nitrates, pH, and DO levels.Hope this helped,Evan
Lee E. Dunbar has written: 'Statistical analysis of water quality data, 1973-1982' -- subject(s): Analysis, Observations, Water, Water quality
the king's Privy Council.