Slavery was not profit based. A slave cost ten years labour plus housing, food etc. Wages to free workers made more sense. There must have been other reasons.
convention group of France
My answer would depend on whether you are talking about the legal slave trade, or the consentual slavery lifestyle. Let me know, and I'll answer this one for you. This is during the legal slave trade
There is no positive side to slavery. A person is considered property when they are a slave and treated like property.
One: They are in debt and can no longer afford anything so they go into slavery as a slave. Two: They where born onto it. Three: They were kidnapped into slavery.
Slave owners got very rich from the exploitation of slave labor. It's much cheaper than paying people to work on the plantations.
Slave trade in Britain was outlawed in 1808 when Parliament passed the Slave Trade Act of 1807. However, this did not slavery altogether. The Slavery Abolition Act of 1833 abolished slavery in most British Empires.
It abolished the Slave Trade in the British Empire but not slavery itself...
Of course the slave hated slavery.
No. Slavery and the slave trade had been going on in Africa for centuries before the Atlantic Slave trade came into being.
J. A. Richardson has written: 'Slavery and Augustan literature' -- subject(s): English literature, History, History and criticism, Influence, Political and social views, Slave trade, Slave trade in literature, Slave-trade, Slavery, Slavery in literature
HE ABOLISHED SLAVERY
slave famillies were split up and sold as part of the domestic slave trade
Slave families were split up and sold as part of the domestic slave trade.
Slavery, and the slave trade, largely ended with the Civil War (although some forms of slavery do persist even into the 21st century).
What parts of Europe still had slavery when Christopher Columbus started the slave trade to the Americas?
profit,
carrying loads