Maxwell Plank found a direct relationship between the energy of a photon and its freq. This relationship can be expressed as E=h*f, where E is energy, h is Plank's constant and f is frequency.
For more info:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck\'s_constant
wtf -.-
For a frequency f in vacuum with the speed of light of c = 299792458 m/s meters per second there is the wavelength lambda = c / f. Light speed = wavelength times frequency f = c / lambda and lambda = c / f. So wavelength cannot be directly proportional to frequency. There is a useful calculator for converting wavelength to frequency and vice versa.
Scroll down to related links and look at "Radio and light waves in a vacuum".
Yes. For photons in vacuum, the energy per photon is proportional to the photon's classical, electromagnetic frequency, as E=ℏω=hf. Here, we see a connection between two classical properties of light: the energy and frequency.
E = hf where E is energy, h is Planck's constant, and f is frequency.
Yes, Energy = hf, where 'h' is Planck's Conmstant and 'f' is the frerquency.
If you're talking about the wavelength of an electromagnetic photon,
then the energy it carries is inverselyproportional to it.
Yes; the relation is:
energy = frequency x Plank constant
Frequency, when referring to waves, is directly proportional to the velocity of the wave. Frequency in inversely proportional to the wavelength.
Frequency.
The energy in one photon of any electromagnetic radiation is directly proportionalto its frequency, so that would be inversely proportional to its wavelength.Note: There is no energy in the protons of light, since light has no protons.
Hard to know what you mean by "strength". If you mean power, then the answer is no.
A photon is a theoretical particle of light.The energy of a photon is directly proportional to the frequency of the light.E = hνwhere E = energy of the photonh = Planck's constant = 6.63 × 10-34 m2 kg s-1ν = frequency of the lightNote: ν in the equation above is not the English letter 'v' but the Greek letter 'nu' (pronounced new). (see related link)
The amount of energy in a photon of light is proportional to the frequency of the corresponding light wave.... frequency of the electromagnetic radiation of which the photon is a particle.
Frequency, when referring to waves, is directly proportional to the velocity of the wave. Frequency in inversely proportional to the wavelength.
No. Energy content of wave packet is directly proportional to the frequency.
energy
The photon energy is directly proportional to its frequency: Energy = Planck's constant * frequency.
The energy of a photon is directly proportional to the frequency. Since the frequency is inversely proportional to the wavelength, the energy, too, is inversely proportional to the wavelength.
Yes.
The energy PER PHOTON is directly proportional to the frequency.
Temperature is only sometimes directly proportional to frequency. Temperature however is not always directly proportional to frequency in all cases.
Frequency is inversely proportional to wavelength (higher frequency means a shorter wavelength). Frequency is directly proportional to the energy of the wave (higher frequencies correspond to higher energies).
Frequency.
The energy per photon is directly proportional to the frequency; the frequency is inversely proportional to the wavelength (since frequency x wavelength = speed of light, which is constant); thus, the energy per photon is inversely proportional to the wavelength.