answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Theories

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Scientific must be supported by observations and results from many investigations and are not absolute?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Scientific must be supported by observations and results from many investigations and are not absolute.?

Theories


Must be supported by observations and results from many investigations and are not absolute?

theories :)


What Must Be Supported By Observations And Results From Many Investigations And Are Not Absolute.?

theories :)


Scientific what must be supported by observations and results from many investigators and are not absolute?

theories :)


What must be supported by observations and results from any investigations and are not absolute?

If my memory of third grade serves me, that would be a theory. Theories are based upon observations (e.g.: Observation: That guy's left side looks limp. Theory: He had a stroke) and are not absolute, as until it is tested and proven, there is no way to tell for certain if a theory is true or not.


Is it true that Scientific theories must be supported by observations and results from many investigations and are not absolute?

That is correct. If the result of an experiment cannot be replicated (repeated), the theory is weakened or overturned. In addition, results in general are not absolute as it is always possible something has been overlooked that would significantly alter the theory. For example, Newton's theory of gravity was considered to be very good, and explained the motions of the planets about the sun extremely well. Except for Mercury, whose motion did not fit Newton's model. Eventually Einstein developed a superior theory of gravity (general relativity), which accounted for the motion of Mercury.


Why is the big bang theory a model and not absolute fact?

All scientific theories are basically just consensuses of postulates to guide scientific research in a search for evidentiary proof. Consequently no theory is absolute fact. In the case of the Big Bang theory we also have the problem that we are trying to figure out what happened billions of years in the past, long before any human beings were around to observe those events directly. We have lots of astronomical observations which are relevant to this theory, but it is possible to imagine more than one way to interpret those observations. That said, you should also know that the evidence for the Big Bang theory is quite strong, and no one working in the field of cosmology has any serious doubt about it. It is very well supported. But it is not absolute fact. Nothing in science is taken as being absolute. For absolute truth, you must turn to religion.


Is true about Scientific knowledge?

Scientific knowledge is not absolute.


What is mean absolute percentage error?

The mean absolute percent prediction error (MAPE), .The summation ignores observations where yt = 0.


Who supported absolute monarchies?

a French philosopher: Thomas Hobbes


What is true of the work of all science?

It is all doubtable, testable and open to disproof. This is the strength of the scientific method; it is a heuristic. It does not lead to absolute truth. There are some basic observations that are probably undeniable for all of time, but the more speculative or theoretical a scientific principle is, the more it is vulnerable to change or re-interpretation.


What does a low mean absolute deviation mean?

It means that the observations are all close to their mean value.