0
Scientific must be supported by observations and results from many investigations and are not absolute.?
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Theories
Josie Sporer
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why is the big bang theory a model and not absolute fact?
All scientific theories are basically just consensuses of postulates to guide scientific research in a search for evidentiary proof. Consequently no theory is absolute fact. In the case of the Big Bang theory we also have the problem that we are trying to figure out what happened billions of years in the past, long before any human beings were around to observe those events directly. We have lots of astronomical observations which are relevant to this theory, but it is possible to imagine more than one way to interpret those observations. That said, you should also know that the evidence for the Big Bang theory is quite strong, and no one working in the field of cosmology has any serious doubt about it. It is very well supported. But it is not absolute fact. Nothing in science is taken as being absolute. For absolute truth, you must turn to religion.
Compare and contrast a scientific law with a theory using a VENN diagram?
A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis or group of hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. A theory is valid as long as there is no evidence to dispute it. Therefore, theories can be disproven. Basically, if evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, then the hypothesis can become accepted as a good explanation of a phenomenon. One definition of a theory is to say it's an accepted hypothesis. A law generalizes a body of observations. At the time it is made, no exceptions have been found to a law. Scientific laws explain things, but they do not describe them. One way to tell a law and a theory apart is to ask if the description gives you a means to explain 'why'. As you can see, there is no 'proof' or absolute 'truth' in science. The closest we get are facts, which are indisputable observations. Note, however, if you define proof as arriving at a logical conclusion, based on the evidence, then there is 'proof' in science. I work under the definition that to prove something implies it can never be wrong, which is different. If you're asked to define hypothesis, theory, and law, keep in mind the definitions of proof and of these words can vary slightly depending on the scientific discipline. What is important is to realize they don't all mean the same thing and cannot be used interchangeably.
How is the scientific theory of evolution supported by different disciplines?
Relative and absolute dating of the rocks and the fossils near it (geology and archaeology), as well as chemical components of various surrounding areas are consistent in explaining the diversity of life as explained by theory of evolution. Evolution is also consistent with embryology, genetics, comparative physiology, biochemistry, and more. See the related link below for more details.
Is absolute pressure static pressure?
absolute pressure
Is it true that science rarely develops absolute truths that apply to all living things?
No, because science is based off of observation. Scientists use experimentation and observation to explain the world around us. However, the scientific theories they come up with are only as good as the experiments and observations they make. When something is proven over and over again, people usually accept it as true (like the existence of gravity). However, many scientific theories have been disproven later on throughout history, meaning science isn't always 'true'.
Scientific must be supported by observations and results from many investigations and are not absolute?
Theories
What Must Be Supported By Observations And Results From Many Investigations And Are Not Absolute.?
theories :)
Must be supported by observations and results from many investigations and are not absolute?
theories :)
Scientific what must be supported by observations and results from many investigators and are not absolute?
theories :)
What must be supported by observations and results from any investigations and are not absolute?
If my memory of third grade serves me, that would be a theory. Theories are based upon observations (e.g.: Observation: That guy's left side looks limp. Theory: He had a stroke) and are not absolute, as until it is tested and proven, there is no way to tell for certain if a theory is true or not.
Is it true that Scientific theories must be supported by observations and results from many investigations and are not absolute?
That is correct. If the result of an experiment cannot be replicated (repeated), the theory is weakened or overturned. In addition, results in general are not absolute as it is always possible something has been overlooked that would significantly alter the theory. For example, Newton's theory of gravity was considered to be very good, and explained the motions of the planets about the sun extremely well. Except for Mercury, whose motion did not fit Newton's model. Eventually Einstein developed a superior theory of gravity (general relativity), which accounted for the motion of Mercury.
Why is the big bang theory a model and not absolute fact?
All scientific theories are basically just consensuses of postulates to guide scientific research in a search for evidentiary proof. Consequently no theory is absolute fact. In the case of the Big Bang theory we also have the problem that we are trying to figure out what happened billions of years in the past, long before any human beings were around to observe those events directly. We have lots of astronomical observations which are relevant to this theory, but it is possible to imagine more than one way to interpret those observations. That said, you should also know that the evidence for the Big Bang theory is quite strong, and no one working in the field of cosmology has any serious doubt about it. It is very well supported. But it is not absolute fact. Nothing in science is taken as being absolute. For absolute truth, you must turn to religion.
Is true about Scientific knowledge?
Scientific knowledge is not absolute.
What is mean absolute percentage error?
The mean absolute percent prediction error (MAPE), .The summation ignores observations where yt = 0.
Who supported absolute monarchies?
a French philosopher: Thomas Hobbes
What is true of the work of all science?
It is all doubtable, testable and open to disproof. This is the strength of the scientific method; it is a heuristic. It does not lead to absolute truth. There are some basic observations that are probably undeniable for all of time, but the more speculative or theoretical a scientific principle is, the more it is vulnerable to change or re-interpretation.
What does a low mean absolute deviation mean?
It means that the observations are all close to their mean value.
