Talk to the housing authority that issued the voucher. This is a pretty vicious thing to do, not that it isn't sometimes warranted.
Is the person or family using drugs? What would be your reason for wanting to harass someone on the housing choice voucher? Might just want to live your life if you're not being bothered.
Section 8 usually does not allow renting out of rooms within the same house.
if you make your property a section 8 property who is responsible for problems that occur on the house
In most states YES, but in some states NO. Check with your state.
Absolutely not. A lease must be executed only between the apartment complex or landlord and tenant -- no one else! Besides, it would not make sense to have a cosigner for a section 8 lease, when the rent is being subsidized by the federal government, guaranteeing that its portion of the rent will be paid on time and the tenant pays an affordable amount which is based on his income. So there would be no need for cosigner. Because of this, it should be noted that the section 8 program does not allow one to have roommates.
Bad credit does NOT necessarily stop one from qualifying for a Section 8 housing voucher. Landlords may choose NOT to rent to a Section 8 participant with credit problems, but mostly that's because the potential tenant had issues with their current or previous landlord (e.g.: an eviction) or previous unpaid utility final bill.
Section 8 usually does not allow renting out of rooms within the same house.
Where this is concerned, a Section 8 Tenant is no different from anyone else.
if you make your property a section 8 property who is responsible for problems that occur on the house
I have rented to Section 8 tenants and have no complaints. Rent is paid on time. As far as damages, it's like any other tenant. That's why you collect a security deposit and if that doesn't cover damages you can sue the tenant. But a tenant on Section 8, good luck.
It may be that the Housing Autority cancelled the Section 8 contract because of the tenant's breach. In that case, yes, the tenant is simply responsible for all of the rent, and if the tenant does not pay, the landlord should move forward with eviction. But, there is federal regulation saying that the tenant cannot be evicted if the Housing Authority simply stopped paying for some reason that has nothing to do with the tenant, like the housing authoriy's error, or budget problems.
In most states YES, but in some states NO. Check with your state.
Section 8 is a federal program, and the answer, except under specific circumstances where the tenant is disabled and the relative is a caregiver, is no.
A section 8 voucher has no impact on the rules of the lease or state laws concerning tenancy. However, if a state allows "self-help" evictions, federal rules override such rules and require that a tenant on Section 8 can only be evicted by judicial action.
Some legal scholars believe that any interference with the mail is a violation of the tenant's right to quiet enjoyment, which isn't a violation of Section 8, just the tenant's rights. A better argument is that it is a violation of Federal Law to interfere with the mail. Talk to the local postmaster.
NO, except under specific circumstances under which the tenant is disabled.
No.
This is rather touchy, because a landlord cannot be a relative of the tenant except under certain circumstances where the tenant is disabled