That is very much a matter of opinion. From a practical, purely 'warfare' point of view many - even the British military - might consider it money better spent on other things; or in the case of the military, on weaponry much better suited and much needed for the British Army's mostly policing and peacekeeping tasks of today.
But being a nuclear power has political benefits in the eyes of the British government: you belong to an elite group of 'nuclear' countries; it justifies Britain's prestigious position in the UN Security Council; and it makes you generally being taken seriously on the world stage - exactly the reason why North Korea wants to be considered a nuclear country.
So it's practical and ideological arguments on both sides. You choose for yourself.
Yes, and still does.
Britain and France do.
Yes. Both strategic & tactical nuclear weapons. Great Britain has been a nuclear power since the end of the Second World War. The US & Britain cooperated in the secret nuclear program during WW2 that created the first atomic bombs.
Over the next decade the U.S. is predicted to spend between $620 billion and $661 billion on nuclear weapons. On average right now they spend about $20 billion per year.
In 1998 alone, the US spent an estimate $35.1 billion on the Nuclear Weapons program. Before that, spending on the program exceeded $40 billion, and the spending on the program is expected to rise.
Between 150-250, but no more than 300.
Japan doesn't want any nuclear weapons.But Japan can easily produce nuclear weapons if it wanted to. It has the technology to build nuclear weapons within 1 year-- probably a few months if it wanted.However, most Japanese people are against nuclear weapons. Therefore, they do not have nuclear weapons.
The Iran nuclear power program is supposed, possible, but not confirmed. And finally why some countries have the right to have nuclear weapons and others do not ? TNP proposed the destruction of all nuclear weapons, in all countries, including United States and Great Britain !!
u.s.;china;russia;great britain;france;india;pakistan;israel
Those that are nuclear, such as the nuclear bombs.
4 trillion dollarsAnswer 2:Between 1940 and 1996 the estimated Minimum incurred costs of the US Nuclear Weapons programs is 5.821 Trillion dollars (source: Atomic Audit: The Costs of US Nuclear Weapons since 1940). Maintenance of the Nuclear Weapons alone cost 25 Billion dollars per year (not including guarding them, or secrets etc).
In nuclear weapons depots.