There should be slight limits on the freedom of speech. One reason for that is because there are those who will use that right (if it had no limits) to promote the abuse or violence against others without being responsible for it. Someone could yell out kill them all and if someone actually did it because that person said it then the one who spoke those words would not be liable. With restrictions in the law that state that if your words directly lead to some violent acts against someone the people are much better protected and justice can be served to both promoter of that violent act and the one who committed the act of violence.
Freedom of speech should have limits when it incites violence, spreads hate speech, or violates laws protecting individuals from harm. Balancing free speech with the need for a safe and respectful society is essential for democracy to thrive.
It Deppends, You cant say badwords, You cant say anthing thats harmless so there are a few limits but remember some people dont have freedom of speech.
limits freedom of speech
yes
No, that's why it's called freedom.
i dont know help me
They could be placed in jail.
No, that's why it's called freedom.
No, "freedom of speech" should not be capitalized unless it is at the beginning of a sentence or part of a title.
Some people and organizations do not respect freedom of speech or freedom of press. These people can be prosecuted and jailed.
Yes, because it limits the amount that the government can interfere in your life
The guarantee of freedom of speech and the press apply to government limits on your freedom, not your employer's limits. For example, if you work at Gimbel's department store, the government could not stop you from wearing a shirt that advertises for Macy's, but you r employer could. Essentially, because you are free to find another job, your employer can limit your activities in the workplace in ways that the government is not allowed.
no freedom of speech should never be restricted no matter what even if its the end of the world