What specific aspect of Japan`s actions during World War II were you considering as a crime against humanity? Human rights instruments are largely politically-motivated, and there was clearly no appetite among the Allied forces (Russia excluded) to alienate Japan from the world community. All this aside, in the aftermath of the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, an argument made to insist that Japanshould observe human rights would appear largely ironic to any American prosecutors.
yes
Crimes that should be punishable by death, but did not get the death penalty in recent times are; crimes of terror attack, and crimes against humanity.
Please explain what you mean.
No
The phrase should actually read; "Crimes Against Nature - Sodomy." The first part of the phrase ("crimes against nature") spells out the general nature of the statute - she second part of the phrase ("sodomy.") describes the specific offense that is being charged.
no, the us should not join the international court system because we need independence
AnswerOnly when the time and place was opportune, acceptable and prudent. In history it becomes obvious that certain actions and inactions were not in the best interests of humanity and were often undertaken for political or self interest. Time is often the test, and those guilty are rarely available to face retribution. When they can be located and brought to justice they should and must be brought before the courts, tried, and if found guilty they require punishment.Probably when Saddam Huissein was hung for Crimes Against Humanity.
Premeditated violent murder
Genocide really demoralizes a society. In most cases a whole generation is usually cut off. The people who suffer more are usually children and women.
I think he at least should be investigated! As a personal opinion; absolutely not!
Lightsabers shouldn't be considered a threat against humanity if they are used responsibly and safely. Safety courses should be required for someone to responsibly use a lightsaber.
None. Ariel Sharon led the war against well-armed terrorist combatants in Lebanon, 1982-85. This was a necessary military undertaking, to protect Israel's citizens who were being deliberately targeted by terrorist acts. So I think your question should be directed against the terorists.