Want this question answered?
yes they should
No, maintaining a property that is not yours for more than 7 years does not automatically result in eminent domain. Eminent domain is a legal process through which the government can take private property for public use, provided that they provide just compensation to the owner. Simply maintaining a property does not grant ownership or rights under eminent domain laws.
Because a person's property should be sacrosanct, and not subject to taking against their will. Granted, some form of compensation is given, but it is the taker who determines what is paid.
Generally the landowner has no power to stipulate (demand or specify) any terms regarding a taking by eminent domain. It will be done according to the legal process in the jurisdiction. If this affects you it should be discussed with an attorney who specializes in property law in your jurisdiction.
it would fall under the government and that would happen
Eminent Domain is bad because it sometimes violates the fifth amendment with the assistance of courts and judges. People are supposed to be provided with just compensation for their homes. But they are usually not. The case of Kelo v. City of New London just proves this point even more. Eminent domain should not be used, unless it is for the improvement of bridges, tunnels, parks, schools or uses that are truly for use by the public and not private developers.
It shouldn't be stopped because eminent domain is sometimes necessary to prevent greedy, selfish or bigotted people from sabotaging the public good. What is necessary is a revision of the law, and if necessary the Constitution, to prevent any repetition of the recent scandalous behaviour in Connecticut where some people had their family homes taken away so that private enterprise could make some private money.
It gives you the right to a trial by jury, keeps you from being tried twice (double jeopardy) for the same crime, gives you the right to avoid self-incrimination, ensures Due process of law, and defines Eminent domain. All of these of course are subject to court's interpretation, and we've seen lately what liberal judges think of the constitution, eminent domain, due process, and pretty much the rest of the Bill of Rights.
domain functional level should be win2k3 only then you can rename domain controller (like abc.microsoft.com) forest functional level should be win2k3 only then you can rename domain name like (microsoft.com)
No, you should not let you domain expire and then repurcahse it. If you intend on using the domain name again, you should pay any fees early before your ownership is up to prevent someone else who is ready to take it.
Example sentence - He paid more for the domain name than he should have.
As hard as it would be to see a restaurant or park taking the place of your home, there are many positive aspects of eminent domain. If a community is looking for a place to build something that could be used for its citizens as a whole, like a park, road, school, etc, it is important to consider what will benefit a community in its entirety. Not only should the monetary benefits be considered, but the community improvement, beautification, and the possibility of population increase are all positive outcomes. It is also important to consider the potential of a growth of comradery in the community. The development of a new public arena encourages people to congregate, in turn giving people more opportunities to get to know others. In most cases of eminent domain, the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.