answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

This is a personal opinion issue rather than a scientific issue. Experimenting on animals has helped create new drugs or test out new surgery techniques rather than doing direct human testing.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

As this is an opinion question, please feel free to add you answer to the bottom, but please do not erase other contributor's answers.

~ Supervisor.

No because some of the world's animals are disapearring!

This is quite a difficult question to answer. It has been shown that animal testing does provide better care for animals (both human and non-human). But it has also been suggested that observation and changes to living standards and medical understanding has provided more of a contribution to health care than any form of animal research.

Personally I don't think its right as animals who are tested don't have a choice in the matter, whereas many humans are free to volunteer for clincal testing. Also much of the research conduced can be quite harmful which in my view is animal abuse and murder in the cases were the research conducted could be fatal.

I personally feel that if we must conduct research on animals for the benefit of humanity, we should conduct them on humans. There are many people in the world who would be willing to go under clinical testing as long as they are provided with some form of income. Which in the end, as I see it, would mean that the research would be more valid as it is being conducted on the same species as it is intended, as well as providing possibilities for those who may not have any.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Well I am 100% against it if the animals are alive, it is pure cruelty but if they are dead then it cannot do much harm and it might also help discover some cures that can save 1000's of dying animals.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Yes, No they should not be unless its not harm full to the animal.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Should animals be researched for experiments?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Should animals be tested?

No, Animals should not be tested, because animals are killed during the experiments and suffering during studies and they die in vain when they are tested.


Why they should kill animal for experiment?

Animal experiments are acceptable because human experiments aren't good. Since animals have systems like humans, it is acceptable to experiment on them.


Does Jane Goodall think that chimpanzees should be treated differently from other animals used in lab experiments?

Yes


What are the attitudes of religious people to experiments on animals?

It is unreligeous to experiment on animals.


Do you agree with using animals for experiments?

yes


What animals did Gregor Mendel carry experiments on?

In Cows


Who started medicine?

thousands of years ago, the ancient Greek people started for looking for remedies for diseases, they tested herbs on animals and observed their behaviour ... they researched for many years and had some clues, on basis of that clues they performed experiments and finally started making doses.


Are animals still being used for Experiments?

Sadly yes but people are trying to prevent it from happening. But with a bit of luck it should stop soon.


Why should experiments be conducted?

We learn a lot by doing experiments.


What animals live in the chowan basin?

Well i researched it and i didnt find any but it should have some like aleatds birds because birds go everywhere hehhee


What is the definition of antivivisectionists?

People who are against vivisection or experiments on animals.


Is it true scientists should not repeat experiments to see if thir data is reproducible?

no. experiments should be repeatd