definitely not. people are very cruel to animals in labs.
No, it is all human tested
I do not support animal testing. Especially if the animals are being tested on for human products like makeup and shampoo and stuff. if its for the humans then theyshould get humans to agree to safe testing practices. If it is for animals then they should use safe and human practices on some animals. But if the product is made for humans then it should not be tested on animals because it could have a totally different effect on humans then it does animals from- an all around animal loving vegetarian
It will depend on the individual product. The two statements you are referencing are "Not tested on animals" and "For animal use". The phrase "not tested on animals" means the product was not tested for human safety on animals - it is a humane statement, not a statement of toxicity. The phrase "for animal use" means the product is intended for use on animals, but it may or may not have been tested on animals prior to marketing.
Category B: Animal studies indicate no fetal risk, but no human studies; or adverse effects in animals, but not in well-controlled human studies.
Although no Human studies were undertaken, when Norflex was tested on pregnant animals it showed adverse foetal effects. The risks must be weighed between foetal risk and maternal benefit.
In my opinion no. i believe that animals should be treated as equals compared to humans. Some companies test shampoo on animals but why not humans? i think they believe that if something happens to the tested animal i.e. rash then they can improve the shampoo but if a human is tested then they get a rash or infection, then they coiuld get the company in trouble, but that is just my opinion
Using animal testing and also using human cells xx
It's coming out of the ground. You should get it biologically tested before using it for human use.It's coming out of the ground. You should get it biologically tested before using it for human use.
Paracetamol was tested on animals before human testing took place. Paracetamol is capable of causing liver damage in humans and is fatal to most animals.
new medicines are tested to ensure that they work on the right aspect of what they are made for and to see if any side-effects can be harmful or worse, fatal, to human beings.
I think they shouldn't test on animals because animals don't know what's happening and if they did, they wouldn't choose to go through the pain. But with human, they get paid to do it and are talked through it and treat with respect. My opinion is that animals shouldn't be tested on and human should have a choice. We already have everything we 'need' apart from a cure to cancer, and that may never be discovered, cancer is a natural death! Why kill all those animals to make more products that have already been made and tested by another company? They die in the end and don't get treat the slightest bit!
Because it is believed that a human life is more important than an animal's life. People don't think of animals feeling pain, testing on humans seems worse than testing on animals. Most of the products are tested on on humans after they have been tested on animals.