Should babies be baptized

Answer 1

Different views will be proposed on this but I think that it is not biblical to baptize infants. Baptism in The Bible is a symbol of someone's faith and belief in Jesus Christ (it doesn't save anyone), so then baptizing an infant wouldn't make sence becasue an infant is too young still to have an understanding of God and then believe and trust in Him. Baptism in a person needs to wait until a person is older and after they have belived in and trusted Jesus Christ to be their savior. Then baptism will serve as a public symbol to show that you have made the descision to follow Jesus. Now, you might ask the question "Well, what will an infant do if they die, do they go to heaven or hell?" Well, I think there is an age of which where since the baby doesn't understand belief in God, then the baby will go to heaven. But the won't account for once it is old enough to understand the salvation and saving power of God. Now, there will be differing views on this but I think that this mostly covers the Evangelical Christian view.

This above answer is correct in some ways but it is missing the main reason for Baptism of a baby in the Roman Catholic faith, it is to wash away "Original" sin, the result to make the child pure and without sin. The above answer is more specific to Baptist faith.

The Catholic Church recommends baptism as soon as possible after the baby is born.

Answer 2

Romans 10:17 - So then faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. Can a baby hear and understand the word of God? Mark 16:16 - He who believes and is baptized will be saved; but he who does not believe will be condemned.Acts 8:36-38 - Now as they went down the road, they came to some water. And the eunuch said, "See, here is water. What hinders me from being baptized?" Then Philip said, "If you believe with all your heart, you may." And he answered and said, "I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God." So he commanded the chariot to stand still. And both Philip and the eunuch went down into the water, and he baptized him. Does a baby have the capacity to believe the gospel and confess Christ as the Son of God? AllNew Testament teaching on baptism attests that babies are not fit subjects for it, thus one must conclude that they are not in need of it. Luke's gospel tells us that Jesus felt the need to be "about His Father's business" at the age of 12 (Luke 2:42-49), which gives us a guideline as to when children are reaching the age of accountability, depending on their level of maturity and understanding.

Answer 3

As baptism (as practised by John and submitted to by Jesus) was a sign of death and rebirth, it seems logical to me that it should take place when a person is old enough (early teens at the youngest, but preferably later) to understand the implications. But most Christians would call me a heretic, or worse. There are some interesting texts on baptism in the new testament, which may guide your thinking.

Answer 4

Roman Catholic AnswerYes, from the Catechism of the Catholic Church:

1250 Born with a fallen human nature and tainted by original sin, children also have need of the new birth in Baptism to be free from the power of darkness and brought into the realm of the children of God, to which all men are called. (Council of Trent (1546): DS 1514; cf. Col 1:12-14) The sheer gratuitousness of the grace of salvation is particularly manifest in infant Baptism. The Church and the parents would deny a child the priceless grace of becoming a child of God were they not to confer Baptism shortly after birth. (Cf. CIC, can. 867).

1252 The practice of infant Baptism is an immemorial tradition of the church. There is explicit testimony to this practice from the second century on, and it is quite possible, that, from the beginning of the apostolic preaching, when whole "households" received baptism, infants may also have been baptized. (Cf. Acts 16:15; 33; 18:8; 1 Cor 1:16, etc.)

Answer 5

caus babby need baptism becaus to throwe away the bad sins of adam and eve