answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Most certainly not side-by-side. That would imply that they are equivalent notions. Evolution, however, is a scientific theory, and creationism is religious myth. Evolution belongs in Biology classes, creationism in something like comparative religion courses.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

opinion:

Creationism should be taught in whatever context it is legal to do so. Ignoring Creationism means ignoring worldwide tradition and the majority of mankind.

See also:

Is there evidence for Creation?

Can you show that God exists?

Seeing God's wisdom

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

Each should be taught in the appropriate context, as long as it is legal to do so. Evolution should be taught in science lessons, since it is a science but, of course, not in religious lessons. Creationism may be taught in lessons on religion if religious instruction is a permitted part of the curriculum. Being a topic of religion, creationism should not be taught alongside evolution in science courses.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Should evolution and creationism be taught side by side in school?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Biology

What does creationism mean?

According to Wikipedia, Creationism is the religious belief that humanity, life, the Earth, and the universe were created in their original form by a deity (often the Abrahamic God of Judaism, Christianity and Islam) or deities.Initially, Creationism developed as a response by a minority of Christians to the Theory of Evolution. Its advocates attempted to have Creationism taught, in US schools, in science classes as a valid alternative to evolution. The courts blocked this attempt, on the grounds that Creationism is a topic of religion and to teach it in science classes would breach the separation of church and state.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation


What are the differences and similarities between creationism intelligent design and evolution?

The first two say "gee - it's so complicated somebody must have planed it" along with the extra ego trip that says that we're pretty special. Evolution says that one single rule can generate complexity from simplicity. (The rule is let the weak weed themselves out - we call it death.) Forget the God argument ... He could have invented evolution too. In fact, it would take a superior sort of entity to do do so.


What is the difference between god's creation and evolution?

Creationism says that God or gods created the Earth and all life upon it. Prior to modern science, most religions taught some variation of this idea. The Theory of Evolution argues that the "design" of life developed gradually over time, as a result of environmental pressure and competition between species. Currently, all known scientific evidence supports the Theory of Evolution, and no evidence for Creationism has ever been found. Many religious people accept the Theory of Evolution, but believe that God foresaw the appearance of modern humans.


What are facts about creationism?

In creation God created the heavens and the earth. Some people believe in evolution but think about it. Do you believe earth was made because of random disorders or because something bigger than us with power created it?


What is a clever title for evolution v. creationism persuasive essay. I am for evolution?

Richard Dawkins battles the creationism and evolution landscape with many a lengthy book on the subjects or, presumably, clever article. The titles of his books are quite good, such as Climbing Mount Improbable or The Selfish Gene or River out of Eden or The Ancestor's Tale. I have no idea of any titles for you (obviously you can't use Dawkins' titles). I did once consider the title The Intelligent Design of Education, for an article on whether Intelligent Design was worthy to be taught alongside or instead of evolution in classes. The title was supposed to imply the 'intelligent design' of education and educational decrees in cases where they excluded such things as Intelligent Design and creationism. Of course, 'clever' titles on this topic are likely to amuse biologists and infuriate fundamentalists. On April the 1st of one year (probably a complete April Fool), it appeared that Scientific American (I think it was that) wrote an editorial saying things like we scientists should discard observation and experiment and embrace faith and creationism. One wonders how that went down. Still, as I say, a complete April Fool.For your title, you can use plays on words, which are always clever. I sometimes rather like alliteration. Test your language. Look at the context and final product of your essay. Flip words this way and that. As I say, try puns and plays on words.In a case where you defy or deny evolution, The Creation of Evolution could be the start of a title, followed by perhaps a derogatory ending that implies it incorrect or idiotic.In the case in which you find holes in and dismiss creationism, try The Evolution of Creation, perhaps implying that creation is a made-up story that is imagined by creatures that are simply the product of evolution.Oh well, good luck with your persuasive essay. Gather your facts well and good luck with the title.

Related questions

Do you think that Evolution and Creationism should be taught in school?

Evolution is a widely accepted scientific theory supported by extensive evidence, and should be taught in science classes. Creationism, however, is based on religious beliefs and is not supported by scientific evidence, so it is not appropriate to be taught in a science classroom. It may be more suitable for discussion in courses on religion or philosophy.


Is creationism taught in Ohio public schools?

Creationism is not taught in Ohio public schools as part of the science curriculum. It may be taught in a cultural or sociological classroom setting, depending on the teacher or school. Only evolution is taught as a scientific theory for the origin of life in biology/science classes.


Can evolution and creationism be taught in the classroom?

They can both be taught in classrooms. However creationism cannot be taught as if it were scientifically verifiable fact in public schools, as it is not science, and the US constitution prohibits federal or state funded (educational) institutions promoting religion. So if creationism is taught in public school, then it must be taught in comparative religion or philosophy classes, and not in biology classes.


Why creationism shouldn't be taught in school?

Creationism can and should be taught in a sociology classroom setting, but not in a science classroom like some people want it to be. The reason for this is that creationism is not a scientific theory or even principle, it's part of cultural mythology.


How should evolution and creationism be taught in schools?

Evolution should be taught in science classes as the scientific consensus, supported by evidence from multiple scientific disciplines. Creationism, as a religious belief, can be addressed in theology or philosophy classes, or as part of discussions on cultural diversity and belief systems. It is essential to maintain the separation of science and religion in the education system.


Should public schools teach creationism alongside evolution in science classes?

No, public schools should not teach creationism alongside evolution in science classes because creationism is not based on scientific evidence and is considered a religious belief. Science classes should focus on teaching scientifically supported theories and concepts. Students can explore creationism in a religious studies class or outside of the science curriculum.


Why should creationism not be taught in school?

Creationism is based on religious beliefs and is not supported by scientific evidence. Teaching creationism in schools violates the separation of church and state mandated by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Science classes should focus on teaching scientifically supported theories like evolution to ensure students receive a comprehensive and accurate education.


Why should evolution not be taught in schools?

Evolution should be taught in schools because it is a well-established scientific theory supported by a vast amount of evidence. Understanding evolution is essential for students to grasp the principles of biology and to critically evaluate scientific knowledge. Teaching evolution does not imply denying or negating any individual's beliefs or religious views.


What laws are there in Ohio regarding the teaching of evolution and creation in school?

In Ohio's Public School system, Evolution is taught in all science classes. "Creationism" is generally reserved for either private study, or a Religion Class. The State of Ohio does not have a law requiring this, but it is an understanding that a debate on creationism does not belong in a Science classroom, but rather a Theology classroom.


Can creationism be thought in school in America?

Creationism can be taught in public schools in America after the Supreme court ruling of Stone v. Graham.


When was creationism taught in public schools?

Biblical creation was taught as fact in United States public schools until the latter part of the nineteenth century, because it was simply assumed that the Bible explained what really happened. From the late nineteenth century until the 1920s, the Theory of Evolution was accepted in the United States more or less without comment, and slowly began to be taught in schools. Then, in the early 1920s, a number of southern state legislatures began to pass legislation banning the teaching of evolution in public schools. It was the Tennessee law that was challenged in the infamous Scopes Trial of 1921, leading to creationism being withdrawn from public school science curriculums.The teaching of creationism having been found to be unconstitutional, attempts were then made over the following decades to have creationism taught alongside evolution, to rebadge creationism as 'science' in order to satisfy constitutional requirements, and to place stickers in science textbooks, to undermine acceptance of evolution and draw attention to creationism. All these attempts appear to have failed.For more information on the creationism debate, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation


How come creationism isn't taught in public schools?

Creationism is typically not taught in public schools because it is considered a religious belief rather than a scientific theory. Public schools aim to teach science based on evidence and the scientific method, which includes the theory of evolution as the foundation of biology education. Teaching creationism in public schools can be seen as promoting a specific religious viewpoint, which goes against the separation of church and state principle in the United States.