No, it should not be reject but only limited.
Foreign aid is intended to result in development.
A disadvantage of foreign aid to a developing country might be the amount of money used for foreign aid when domestic aid is needed. It can be known up front if the aid will benefit the developing country.
The decision to increase foreign aid should consider both humanitarian and strategic interests. Enhanced foreign aid can help address global challenges such as poverty, disease, and climate change, fostering stability and goodwill. It also serves U.S. interests by promoting economic development and political stability in partner countries, which can reduce the likelihood of conflict and migration. Ultimately, the effectiveness and impact of such aid should guide any increase in funding.
Foreign aid
Foreign aid is help such as economic or military assistance provided by one country to another.
Russia does not give foreign aid to the usa. In fact Russia killed most or all of it's foreign aid back in the 90's with the collapse of the Soviet Union and has just recently started a foreign aid program again.
Foreign Aid
foreign aid
The Kellogg-Briand Pact basically rejected the idea that war should be used as a method of foreign policy.
The U.S. should not give foreign aid. When we attacked Hiroshima what did we do next? We rebuilt them, why? To allow them to attack us again of course. India is its own country, why send so much money to a foreign place that doesn't seem to get any better, when the streets and slums of the U.S. could use the money better?
The U.S. should not give foreign aid. When we attacked Hiroshima what did we do next? We rebuilt them, why? To allow them to attack us again of course. India is its own country, why send so much money to a foreign place that doesn't seem to get any better, when the streets and slums of the U.S. could use the money better?
Economic assistance, international aid, military assistance, overseas aid...