If you're talking about Jacques Charles, then it should be called Charles's law because it's a natural aspect of Earth.
this is not a real questions
I think hypothesis
A well tested idea that explains and connects a wide range of observations is a scientific theory. This is sometimes confused with a scientific law.
Not sure how to answer this as scientific theories are not subject to the law but are supported by overwhelming evidence. The only time that evolution or the theory that supports it is in a court of law is when some public school somewhere, or some state somewhere tries to introduce religion into the classroom disguised inder the terms creation " science : or intelligent design.There is no theory of evolution put forward by Charles Darwin that includes intelligent design. If fact the theory of evolution by natural selection is the antithesis of intelligent design.
Because there's supporting evidence for it. Lots of supporting evidence. Overwhelming, awe-inspiring amounts of supporting evidence.A scientific theory is not just a guess. My chemistry teacher explained it this way: a theory is something we can explain (the theory of evolution or the theory of relativity). A law is something we can't explain (the law of gravity. We know it works, we're just not sure exactly why or how).Charles Darwin spent years developing his hypothesis of natural selection. There is ample evidence supporting his final theory, some found long after his death. To this day, archeologists still find fossil evidence that fits into Darwin's explanation of changing species.
David Ricardo's theory called the Iron Law of Wages came to be called the Theory of Efficiency of Wages. The Iron Law of Wages says that the worker is going to be paid the minimum wage needed to survive.
There is no definition - what's called a "law" is a simplified version of some theory.
Since it is called "the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle" it is neither a scientific law nor a theory. It is a principle.
Scientific law
DISMAL
DISMAL
A scientific law is one that has been tested throughout hypothesis and theory and proven to be true all the time.
A theory that has been extensively tested and seems to apply everywhere in the universe si sometimes called a Law or a Natural Law.
They're both descriptions (or interpretations if you wish) of reality as we understand it. A theory relates to how we understand a thing, and a "law" just describes how something should react.
They're both descriptions (or interpretations if you wish) of reality as we understand it. A theory relates to how we understand a thing, and a "law" just describes how something should react.
A theory. (And sometimes called a law.)
A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of a natural phenomenon that is supported by evidence and can be used to make predictions. It is a broad explanation that may encompass multiple related hypotheses. In contrast, a scientific law is a statement that describes a consistently observed behavior in nature but does not explain the underlying reasons for that behavior. Laws are usually more specific and narrow in scope compared to theories.