The problem with banning a form of government is that, if the people or group in charge decide to use it, there is nothing anyone can do about it. Generally, the form of governance is decided by the people and is usually limited (in this case, the restricted example would be a constitutional monarchy) to a certain extent.
The other response is, why? Monarchy as a form of rule is fairly stable and there is a reason it was used for so long, survived so many upheavals in society that destroyed many other social precepts, that there is no reason to ban it. If you were going to target a form of rule, try getting oligarchy or Dictatorship (modern dictatorship, not the original Roman kind) banned. That would do a lot more good for the world.
zoos should not be banned
Christianity is illegal(banned)in Saudi Arabia, which is an Islamic theocratic monarchy.
they should be banned because there very unhealthy
yes i think that it should be banned.
no the royal family should not be banned
Cigarettes should be banned because they can damage your lungs.
Why Would It Be Banned? , No
Large cars should be or should not be banned in India
Hunting will never be banned and should not be.
Fireworks should not be banned! But if they were to be banned, it would be because they can be dangerous and can cause a house to catch on fire. But still they should not be banned!
for sure it should be banned, it actually should be banned from the whole world and anyway they smoke like heck in england.
Should the Bible Be Banned was created in 1988-04.