It is entirely up to the Australian public and Government, there can't be any justification for saying "should", but up to now opinion has been resolutely opposed.
In Australia they use no nuclear energy. They only have on reactor which is only used for medical purposes.
It can be used to generate power but it is very dangerous yet little nuclear energy can generate ALOT of power.
Actually it is good and bad. Nuclear energy can save many people lives but in can be used as nuclear weapons which are super dangerous. resulting in explosions.
No
Nuclear energy is used to produce steam. This steam used to rotate turbines
In Australia they use no nuclear energy. They only have on reactor which is only used for medical purposes.
It can be used to generate power but it is very dangerous yet little nuclear energy can generate ALOT of power.
Uranium is used as nuclear fuel in nuclear reactors.
Magnesium is not used in the nuclear energy.
Actually it is good and bad. Nuclear energy can save many people lives but in can be used as nuclear weapons which are super dangerous. resulting in explosions.
There is only one nuclear power station in Sydney, which is used for research purposes. Other than this they play no role in providing power in Australia. Australia does however have the resources of uranium for it but export the majority of it to China.
Nuclear fuel is the fuel used to produce nuclear energy.
No, there is only one low power reactor used for making radioisotopes and research.
No
Some think so, some don't
Nuclear energy is used to produce steam. This steam used to rotate turbines
Saying nuclear energy is like saying Norwegian furniture. Nuclear power/energy is used everywhere, in 2009 20% of all electricity in the US was nuclear origin.