0
What else can I help you with?
Should parents be held responsible for their children's misbehavior?
Parents should be held accountable to some extent for their children's misbehavior, as they play a crucial role in shaping their children's behavior. However, the extent of their responsibility may vary depending on the situation and the age of the child. It is important for parents to provide guidance, set boundaries, and teach their children to be responsible for their actions.
Why should you be responsible for other people's actions?
Generally speaking, we are not. We are, however, usually responsible for the actions of our children, and possibly for people in our care.
What are three things parents are responsible for to protect their children's health?
Parents are responsible for providing food, clothing, and shelter for their children. Ideally, parents should also take their children for regular checkups and recommended vaccinations and should be sure their children are seen by a doctor when ill.
Who is responsible for childrens medical bills?
It depends partially on the age of the children. If they are not adults, the parents are responsible. If the children are above the age of majority, and not on their parents' insurance, they should be responsible for their own debts.
Should parents be criminally responsible for willful damage caused by their children why or why not?
Parents should not be held criminally responsible for willful damage caused by their children, as children are generally considered to lack the full capacity to understand the consequences of their actions. Instead, parents can be held civilly liable or encouraged to engage in responsible parenting practices to prevent such behavior. Criminal responsibility typically requires intent and an understanding of wrongdoing, which children may not possess. Moreover, focusing on rehabilitation and education rather than punishment is more beneficial for both the child and the family.
Should parents be held responsible for their children break laws?
Parents can be held responsible for their children's actions in some cases, particularly if they have been directly negligent in supervising or controlling their child's behavior. However, each situation is unique and factors such as the age of the child and the severity of the offense should be taken into consideration before assigning blame solely to the parents.
What are the pros and cons to parents being responsible for their children's actions?
cons:a parent can't control a child when they are away from home. pro:a parent should have shown a child right from wrong before they leave home.
Should parents be held responsible when their children break law?
yes because the parents teach the their own child how they want and then he/she acts on it.
What actions will be taken if some parents does not send their children to school?
i think they should be punished in any way or we should make them aware about the importance of education for the bright future of their children..
Should Parents be penalized when teenagers under eighteen commit crimes?
To a certain extent, yes. Parents are supposed to be responsibly for their childrens actions. And children need to respect their parents as well.
Why you should not sacrifice yourself?
You should not sacrifice yourself or your values for anyone else. You are accountable for your actions. Certain situations require sacrifices such as parents with their children.
Should parents be held responsible for their child actions?
A parents' responsibility is to properly raise the children and give them a good foundation on which to build upon later in life. So... Yes if: The child has any type of disability, if the child is younger than 13, or if the parent could not control their child, and did not ask for help. But... No if: The child is in their teen years and does not have a disability that would include horrible behavior. It's the kids' fault, the kid did it, so why should the parents be responsible for it?
