Want this question answered?
i do not think they should be penalized but again its all up to the government
yes
no.
Absolutely! I should know...I was penalized once for this!
The answer will depend on your specific crime and record. You should contact the US Attorney office in your area for assistance.ADDED: Unless you were convicted in federal court of a federal offense - contacting the US Attorney will be of no help to you.If you were convicted of a state offense; Petition the Chief Judge of the Circuit Court in which you were convicted. For further information - - see below link:
Yes they should. Once they have been released, they have served whatever penalty society has chosen to inflict upon them. If they should not be allowed to live where they choose, that would mean that they should not have been released. While they are still in jail, they do not have the freedom to live where they choose. That is the way that society restricts people's freedom of movement, by putting them in jail. If you believe that convicted sex offenders should never be allowed to live where they choose, then the way to do that is to require a life sentence (or a death penalty) with no chance of parole for all convicted sex offenders. But if you are willing to let them out of jail then you must also allow them to live where they wish. In theory, they have learned their lesson and will not commit further crimes. And if they do commit further crimes, they can go to jail again. Meanwhile, like anyone else, they are entitled to be considered innocent until proven guilty. That's how the justice system works.
Hello............ There are NO DECENT CRIMINALS, and further any Criminal that harms another Human or Animal is a threat to society and should be either put in prison for 40 years automatic for taped or live streamed. And if they are convicted by trial then 20 years banished to an Island in the middle of nowhere to fend for themselves, and let's see how well they work for their food.
Yes but only if you have been convicted of crime.
Yes, he should be convicted because of the strong evidences against him!
Those on probation and parole should not only be permitted to work, perhaps required to work, but employers who discriminate against them should be civilly and perhaps criminally penalized, within reason of course. Those who have been convicted of theft should not be permitted to work in a position where this could become an issue. Those who have drug convictions should not work in pharmacies. However, where the criminal conviction has no direct link to the type of employment, no impediment should exist.
No
yes