In my opinion, as much as possible.
In the prime years of the Roman Republic, a case can be made for the Senate making most of the political decisions.
A political ideal is a vision or concept of what a just and desirable society should be like, including how power is distributed, how decisions are made, and what values should guide society's actions. It often serves as a reference point for political movements and policies.
Washington didn't *do* decisions, he made them. What sort of decision are you asking about? Personal, political, military? He made a lot of very important decisions. Way to many to answer briefly.
The process by which policy decisions are made is known as politics. A country's political system is the framework for how politics is carried out in that country.
Laws are made by democratically elected legislatures.
Some of them should, yes. But if you are talking about groups that are larger than a few dozen, this becomes completely impractical as a way of dealing with ALL important political decisions. The US government would shut down instantly; there are too many people for this to work. That is why in the US we have a representative system; people are elected to make decisions for many.
Certainly. The right to criticize is a fundamental requirement for freedom. Final decisions on foreign policy are made by the Senate after due discussion.
true
your beautiful.
what to do about mexico: if they should have war or not
Civic and political participation is important so that decisions are not made by a few people. Participation by the masses insures greater freedom.
Hitler was elected democratically but then made himself a dictator.