In my opinion, as much as possible.
In the prime years of the Roman Republic, a case can be made for the Senate making most of the political decisions.
A political ideal is a vision or concept of what a just and desirable society should be like, including how power is distributed, how decisions are made, and what values should guide society's actions. It often serves as a reference point for political movements and policies.
Washington didn't *do* decisions, he made them. What sort of decision are you asking about? Personal, political, military? He made a lot of very important decisions. Way to many to answer briefly.
The process by which policy decisions are made is known as politics. A country's political system is the framework for how politics is carried out in that country.
Some of them should, yes. But if you are talking about groups that are larger than a few dozen, this becomes completely impractical as a way of dealing with ALL important political decisions. The US government would shut down instantly; there are too many people for this to work. That is why in the US we have a representative system; people are elected to make decisions for many.
Laws are made by democratically elected legislatures.
true
your beautiful.
what to do about mexico: if they should have war or not
Certainly. The right to criticize is a fundamental requirement for freedom. Final decisions on foreign policy are made by the Senate after due discussion.
Civic and political participation is important so that decisions are not made by a few people. Participation by the masses insures greater freedom.
The establishment, which includes government officials, political parties, and influential individuals, plays a significant role in shaping political decisions and policies. They often have the power and resources to influence decision-making processes, lobby for certain policies, and set the agenda for political discussions. Their influence can impact the direction of policies and decisions made by elected officials.