In the prime years of the Roman Republic, a case can be made for the Senate making most of the political decisions.
The Roman Republic was a form of government in ancient Rome where elected officials represented the people and made decisions on their behalf. Canadian democracy, on the other hand, is a modern system where citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf in a parliamentary system. The key difference lies in the time period, structure of government, and societal norms that shaped each system.
Tribunes were elected by the plebeians, the common people of ancient Rome. This election process was part of the political reforms that allowed the plebeians to have representation and protect their interests against the patrician class. The tribunes had the power to veto decisions made by the Senate and other magistrates, making their role crucial in the Roman Republic's political system.
In Greece democracy meant power by the people. In democratic Athens the citizens gathered in the assembly of the people made all the decisions and voted on laws. The executive was there to carry out the will of the people. The Roman Republic instead was an oligarchy. Although the people could vote on laws and elect the officers of state, the most powerful political body was the senate, whose senators were not elected and were members of the oligarchy.
Athenian Democracy is often considered more democratic than the Roman Republic due to its direct participation model, where eligible citizens could vote on laws and decisions in assemblies. In contrast, the Roman Republic had a representative system where elected officials, such as senators, made decisions on behalf of the citizens, limiting direct citizen involvement. However, the Roman Republic allowed for a broader representation of classes and a more structured legal system. Ultimately, while both systems had democratic elements, Athenian Democracy emphasized direct citizen engagement more than the representative nature of the Roman Republic.
Each had assemblies of the citizens which made decisions on significant issues, which decisions were implemented by the council/senate.
made policy decisions
the senate
Roman society was divided into the patricians (the aristocracy), the equites (equestrians) who were bankers, money lenders, merchants and investors in shipping and mining, and the plebeians (the commoners). there were also slaves and freedmen
The Roman Republic was a form of government in ancient Rome where elected officials represented the people and made decisions on their behalf. Canadian democracy, on the other hand, is a modern system where citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf in a parliamentary system. The key difference lies in the time period, structure of government, and societal norms that shaped each system.
Tribunes were elected by the plebeians, the common people of ancient Rome. This election process was part of the political reforms that allowed the plebeians to have representation and protect their interests against the patrician class. The tribunes had the power to veto decisions made by the Senate and other magistrates, making their role crucial in the Roman Republic's political system.
In Greece democracy meant power by the people. In democratic Athens the citizens gathered in the assembly of the people made all the decisions and voted on laws. The executive was there to carry out the will of the people. The Roman Republic instead was an oligarchy. Although the people could vote on laws and elect the officers of state, the most powerful political body was the senate, whose senators were not elected and were members of the oligarchy.
Athenian Democracy is often considered more democratic than the Roman Republic due to its direct participation model, where eligible citizens could vote on laws and decisions in assemblies. In contrast, the Roman Republic had a representative system where elected officials, such as senators, made decisions on behalf of the citizens, limiting direct citizen involvement. However, the Roman Republic allowed for a broader representation of classes and a more structured legal system. Ultimately, while both systems had democratic elements, Athenian Democracy emphasized direct citizen engagement more than the representative nature of the Roman Republic.
Fair is a flexible word. Both democracies had their good and bad points. But i both, the assemblies of the citizens made decisions carried out by the Senate/Council. Sometimes bad decisions were made, and the citizens brought 'unfairness' on themselves.
The Roman republic was established to rid the people of a one man rule. They preferred to be governed by a consensus.
The government of the Roman Republic.
By 494 BC, the office of the "Tribune of the Plebs" was established in Roman government, with ten tribunes elected each year. These tribunes were representatives of the plebeians, the common people of Rome, and were granted the power to protect their interests and veto decisions made by the patrician class. This development marked a significant step in the struggle for political equality within the Roman Republic.
The legislative body in ancient Rome used to be called the Roman Senate. It was responsible for making laws and decisions that governed the Roman Republic. The Senate was made up of Roman aristocrats and served as an advisory council to the consuls, who were elected leaders of Rome.