No! Them wanting immunity is the same as admitting to being a criminal. How can we hold lawmakers accountable if they have immunity? This is a terrible notion, and has tyranny written all over it.
political immunity can be seen as a huge obstacle for democracy and principle of equity because it enables politicians failures or spoilt movements to cover up. also, it should be removed cause it's the part of monarchical era (rooted from british law) and there is no place for political immunity in democratic, improved countries
Political parties, and politicians, (in my opinion), should simply be honest. Whether citing the national debt or national policies, be honest with citizens. Voters don't like liars or the "political spin".
The opener to a political speech should be intriguing and captivating. Some politicians like to start with a joke to warm the audience up and others like to jump right in with passion.
this answer is i have no idea!!!!!!!!!!!!! bye
No. Voting rights are one of the things that people should not take for granted. Yes. Politicians have sued voters for attempting to impose term limits.
You bet they should and so should the Presidency and the Premiers and politicians in Canada as well.
"Transactional immunity" - gives full immunity from prosecution for a crime revealed from the testimony of a witness. This type acts much like a full pardon for the offence, once granted one may not be prosecuted. "Use" immunity - is the base line protection afforded by the 5th Amendment, use of compelled testimony and the use of evidence derived form the testimony can't be used to convict a witness. To be convicted for a crime testified about, the prosecution has the burden to show that the evidence used was derived by a complete, separate source of information.
In order to show positive immunity your blood level must reach a level of 1.10 If it's 90 then you have no immunity and should be vaccinated. If you are between say 1.00 to 1.09 then you some immunity but should have a booster of either measles (mmr) or varicella.
Judges interpret the laws and legislators (or politicians) enact the laws. The separation of powers requires that the judiciary and the legislative branches remain separate, and accordingly judges should remain politically neutral.
yes, graduation should be the minimum qualification for the politicians
Yes,
no