0
Should polygraph testing be admissible in court which test Frye or Daubert is more appropriate and the potential effect this testimony could have on a given case?
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
US supream court deemed the "Lie detector" test inadmissable as evidence because it isn't an exact science. It is unreliable and can false-test positive even when no one is connected to it.
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is a 7 letter word for secondhand testimony not admissible in criminal court?
hearsay
Why will the Mormon prophet not submit to a polygraph?
he will not submitt to one because he is busy doing the lord's work and does not need a polygraph to support his testimony of the truth.
Is evidence admissible if A testifies that he saw B slap C?
Yes. Person A is an 'eye-witness'. His testimony is admissible as evidence because he was present when person B assaulted person C.
Can a judge allow testimony against someone based on a trial that was dismissed?
A trial cannot be dismissed. A case can be dismissed before it goes to trial. A judge can allow testimony if it is within the bounds of admissible evidence, regardless of whether or not that evidence was presented at a prior hearing or trial.
Which secondhand testimony is not admissible in criminal court?
The first thing that jumps to everyone's mind is so-called HEARSAY TESTIMONY. However, in actual fact there are many examples of hearsay customarily being admitted via court-sanctioned exceptions.
Is hearsay proof for a theft case?
No, hearsay is not admissible in any court case unless it falls under one of 18 exceptions. These exceptions are thought to remove the problems of hearsay testimony.
How could polygraph results be used in plea bargaining?
The polygraph is sometimes useful to develop leads. Verify statements and crosscheck information. Moreover, it provides the police with a psychological advantage that may lead to a confession. Such confessions are admissible in court even though the test results are not. The proper tests are then determined, and the questions prepare and reviewed with the subject. After the test is completed, the subject and the police advised of the results in person or by letter. If the test indicates deception, an individual interrogation may follow. Any confessions that follow from such tests are almost universally accepted by the courts. The examiner's testimony is not conclusive evidence but rather opinion evidence regarding either guilt or innocence.
Are expert reports admissIble into evidence without cross examination?
Sir, From the Indian Criminal Justice System Point of view, Reports of the officers envisaged under section 293(4) are admissible without cross examination along with any forensic or ballistic report by any government lab, as per judgement by the Hon'ble SC in H.P v. Mastram (2004) SCC, i dont remember the exact judgement though. _________________________ In most jurisdictions in the US, expert testimony is only admissible if both parties are given the opportunity to examine the expert witness, and thus only live testimony could be admitted.
Why was it silly for Alice to be called as a witness?
It was silly for Alice to be called as a witness because she was not present at the event in question and therefore would not have firsthand knowledge to provide relevant testimony. Additionally, her testimony would likely be hearsay and not admissible in court.
In civil cases are potential witnesses allowed in court during the hearing?
No, Just as in criminal cases all potential witnesses are excluded from the hearing or trial until their turn comes to testify. This is so that their testimony is not 'tainted' or influenced by what they hear during anyone else's testimony.
Are officers field notes are not considered official evidence and are not admissible as possible evidence?
No, officers' field notes can be considered official evidence and may be admissible in court. Field notes document the observations, actions, and conversations made by officers during an investigation or incident. They can serve as valuable sources of information and help support the credibility and accuracy of the officers' testimony. However, their admissibility depends on the specific rules and procedures of the jurisdiction in which the case is being tried.
What is the role of the judge in a jury trial?
The judge in a jury trial is responsible for ensuring that legal procedures are followed, ruling on objections and motions, and providing guidance to the jury on the law. The judge also decides on legal issues, such as admissibility of evidence, and issues jury instructions to guide the jury in reaching a verdict.
