0
Are expert reports admissIble into evidence without cross examination?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Sir,
From the Indian Criminal Justice System Point of view,
Reports of the officers envisaged under section 293(4) are admissible without cross examination along with any forensic or ballistic report by any government lab, as per judgement by the Hon'ble SC in H.P v. Mastram (2004) SCC, i dont remember the exact judgement though.
_________________________
In most jurisdictions in the US, expert testimony is only admissible if both parties are given the opportunity to examine the expert witness, and thus only live testimony could be admitted.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
If blood evidence is dried before it's collected is it admissible in court?
Most blood samples collected at crime scenes IS dried. It is easily reconstituted without degrading the cellular evidence it contains.
What is accepted without prejudice?
Prejudice is "preconcived opnion", "Baised", "Without complete examination". So 'Without prejudice' means the opposite i.e. "Not having preconcived opnion", "not Baised" and "With complete examination". . Thanks! -Ru [ruspatil@yahoo.co.in]
If the police broke into a person and home illegally to look for evidence that could be?
To come into a home the police need a search warrant to search. Without the warrant the evidence is not admissible in court. It would be an illegal search.
Can a letter opened illegally be used in court as evidence?
No, evidence obtained illegally, including letters that were opened without permission, is generally not admissible in court due to the exclusionary rule, which prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in legal proceedings.
Is it legal in Texas if your sister-in-law tape recorded your brother without his knowledge?
It depends why your sister in law taped your brother. If she is trying to get grounds for divorce then a tape recording is generally not admissible in a court of law. If a crime was committed and say your brother admitted to that crime it may still not be admissible in a court of law, but some judges may listen to the tape and deem whether it can be used in court as evidence.
What is the difference between a manager with reports and a manager without reports?
A manager with reports has people who report to him and take direction from her. A manager without reports does not have any people reporting to him.
Should evidence obtained during a traffic stop be allowed as admissible evidence when the police officer initiating the traffic stop is not present at defendant's suppression hearing?
This would depend on whether the testimony of the officer initiating the stop was necessary to establish the foundation for introducing the evidence the defendant is seeking to suppress. If foundation can't be established without te officer's testimony, then the evidence should either be suppressed or the hearing continued until the officer can be present.
Is email evidence admissible in Small Claims Court?
Generally the presiding judge decides what form of evidence can be submitted. If an e-mail can be connected to the person without there being any doubt of someone else having sent it, then it is possible it could be used as evidence in some cases. If the e-mail account was accessible to others, it is highly doubtful it would be allowed to be entered as evidence.
Which examination is worlds toughtest examination?
The tests and trials of lifeBar examination to become an attorneyIIT JEE without a doubt.
Is George Sampson racist?
There is no public evidence or reports suggesting that George Sampson is racist. It is important not to make assumptions about someone without concrete information.
How does exclusionary rule prevents officers from performing unlawful searches and seizures?
If an officer were to obtain evidence illegally, such as searching you without probable cause, the evidence they acquired would not be admissible in court. That's not to say the entire case would be thrown out, but that single piece of evidence would not be allowed in court. The exclusionary rule doesn't prevent unlawful searches and seizures, but it disincentivizes them by making evidence seized unlawfully inadmissible at trial. There's no reason to illegally obtain evidence if it can't be used to convict a defendant.
What is the duration of Without Evidence?
The duration of Without Evidence is 1.55 hours.
