It depends on what you mean. In the U.S. by federal law, there are already some restrictions.
people's would should a groups ownership peoples' would show a group of individuals ownership i hope that helps. it makes sense in my mind, but not sure how it will sound to you!
In the U.S. excepting minor legal restrictions, all individuals decide what goods and services should be produced and are free to produce them.
The abolitionist view on slavery is that it is morally wrong and should be abolished, as it violates the fundamental rights and dignity of individuals. Abolitionists believe that all individuals are entitled to freedom and should not be subjected to forced labor or ownership by others.
Individuals should be self-managing as much as possible to foster independence, accountability, and personal growth. Self-management allows individuals to take ownership of their tasks, decisions, and actions, leading to increased efficiency and effectiveness. It also promotes self-awareness, autonomy, and a sense of accomplishment.
Medicare should have less restrictions on home health care.
There is no minimum age for contributing to WikiAnswers - there are restrictions on the age for supervisors etc - but that is because those positions require a certain level of maturity.
Generally, you should be able to but there are some restrictions on flights to certain countries and may not be allowed past customs.
Home equity loans should have stronger restrictions for potential applicants.
The Ab Rocket is used to enhance an individuals abdominal muscles. As with any exercise regimen, a physician should be consulted prior to beginning to use the Ab Rocket.
Why should a business weigh the advantages and disadvantages of each ownership option ?
Which or what empire?
There great individuals that aren't allowed to have certain rights as every human should, there just like everyone else.