This matter involves important moral and ethical issues. For the time being, the answer must be "no"; but that is not to say that we should not allow embro and/or stem-cell research.
cloning should be banned for humans but people pay to have there pets cloned.
Yes, scientists should be allowed to clone humans, as it could advance medical research and provide insights into genetics, potentially leading to breakthroughs in treating diseases. Cloning could also offer solutions for infertility and allow for the development of personalized medicine. However, ethical considerations and regulations must be in place to address potential risks and moral dilemmas associated with human cloning. Careful oversight is essential to ensure responsible use of this technology.
No. There is no need for scientists to clone the Tasmanian Forester kangaroo, as its population is healthy enough. Scientists have only tried to clone the Thylacine (Tasmanian tiger) in attempts which have, to date, been unsuccessful.
no.
It is very possible that scientists will be able to clone people some day. The laws will stipulate how the cloning can be done.
Cloning humans raises ethical concerns, as it may infringe on individual rights, lead to devaluation of human life, and pose risks to the health and well-being of the cloned individuals. Additionally, there are unresolved safety and technical issues surrounding human cloning that could have unknown consequences.
Can You clone anything? As in humans,specify plus they are dead
July 1996
No
They aren't scientists! THEY DON'T HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY FOR THAT!
no
I think it's illegal. Scientists have noticed that there are more birth defects,early sicknesses and die earlier so they are afraid of the result it will have on a human.