Want this question answered?
According to the liberals in California, YES. And all their other medical bills, and their family's medical bills, food, housing and education.
10 - 15%
Yes, smokers can get breast cancer. Smoking increases your chances, but not smoking or quitting does not make you impervious to it.
smokers
Most people who get lung cancer are smokers, so smoking is linked to lung cancer. This is old, old news. But not all smokers end up getting lung cancer. Most smokers, in fact, do not. But it should be noted that there are other maladies (like corinary diseases, to name one) that can end up killing someone whose smoking aggrevates the conditions.
Colon cancer.
In 2000, the American Cancer Society funded research into a skin patch.
Yes, they do.
Type your answer here... The day is designated to provide information to smokers about the impact of smoking on lung cancer and it encourages people to stop smoking for one day.
smoking can give you 3 kinds of diseases: cancer, heart attacks, and strokes.
If ALL smokers developed cancer and ONLY smokers developed cancer and the medical profession knew HOW cancer developed, they may be in a position to hazard an educated GUESS. (Note that ALL plants contain the same "ingredients", or their equivalents, as tobacco.) What is known is that cancer is a multi-factorial condition, i.e. there is not a single "cause" but there are a number of contributing factors, some known, some suspected and some completely unknown.
It helps society by preventing men and women from getting an infection that can cause cancer, and thus not only decreasing deaths from cancer, but decreasing society's medical costs and lost productivity.