It is a part of the checks and balances built into the Constitution. They are appointed and the president gives the names to Congress. Congress conducts hearings and questions the future justice and they make the decision about the person.
It's as appropriate for US Supreme Court justices to suggest potential candidates as it is for any other group, assuming they don't exercise undue influence over the nomination. It is both inappropriate and unconstitutional for them to take an active or official role in the appointment process (and they don't).
yes there should be at least 13 of them .
The justices of the US Supreme Court vote on each case that is brought before them. The decision of the court is whatever a majority of the justices agree on. Each justice has an equal say in the decision.
US Supreme Court Justices should only compare the case in the light of the US Constitution.
Congress decides how many justices should be on the US Supreme Court. The current number, nine, was set by the Judiciary Act of 1869.
Required for what? There are no constitutional mandates governing the number of justices seated on the Supreme Court; such details were left to Congress. Congress determined that a Judiciary Act should never allow fewer than six justices; the current legislation requires nine. A quorum of the current Supreme Court requires at least six justices to hear and decide a case.
Rubbish health insurance, you should check out NHS!
US Supreme Court Justices should not be influenced by Political pressure, popular opinion, or their own biases. They should only compare the case in the light of the US Constitution.
The nine justices shake hands with each of the other nine justices to remind themselves that their differences on the bench should not interfere with the cohesiveness of the Court.
Because they elected George W. Bush.
the number of justices should be increased
123456789101112just kidding idk the answer thats why u should look some were else