It is a part of the checks and balances built into the Constitution. They are appointed and the president gives the names to Congress. Congress conducts hearings and questions the future justice and they make the decision about the person.
It is generally not appropriate for US Supreme Court justices to be actively involved in the selection of new justices. The process of selecting new justices should be independent and free from any potential bias or conflicts of interest. This ensures that the justices are selected based on their qualifications and merit rather than personal or political affiliations.
yes there should be at least 13 of them .
The justices of the US Supreme Court vote on each case that is brought before them. The decision of the court is whatever a majority of the justices agree on. Each justice has an equal say in the decision.
US Supreme Court Justices should only compare the case in the light of the US Constitution.
Congress decides how many justices should be on the US Supreme Court. The current number, nine, was set by the Judiciary Act of 1869.
Required for what? There are no constitutional mandates governing the number of justices seated on the Supreme Court; such details were left to Congress. Congress determined that a Judiciary Act should never allow fewer than six justices; the current legislation requires nine. A quorum of the current Supreme Court requires at least six justices to hear and decide a case.
Rubbish health insurance, you should check out NHS!
The nine justices shake hands with each of the other nine justices to remind themselves that their differences on the bench should not interfere with the cohesiveness of the Court.
US Supreme Court Justices should not be influenced by Political pressure, popular opinion, or their own biases. They should only compare the case in the light of the US Constitution.
Because they elected George W. Bush.
the number of justices should be increased
123456789101112just kidding idk the answer thats why u should look some were else