We should not have nuclear power in the future because so many things can happen; for example people can get skin cancer and can cause high level radioactive waste/and it is very expensive and also nuclear power can cause small accidents. the nuclear power looks like a dick with wee coming out (that is a very true fact) i am very picc or i dont want skin cancer
Certainly yes
we shouuld not have not have
Contesting the Future of Nuclear Power was created in 2011.
Contesting the Future of Nuclear Power has 296 pages.
The nuke
of course it will.
Moral reasons aren't an issue for Nuclear power affairs.. Everything may be dangerous at its beginning, but there isn't another way to develop something without running risks. Moral is related to customs. In the future, I believe that solar energy will substitute nuclear power, unless it becomes much more safer than today is.
After searching for an answer to this question I can only find information on nuclear power generation in power station. I would assume that this complete lack of any information in relation to home nuclear power generation means it will not be a possibility in the near future.
The source of nuclear power is the nucleus of an atom; any atom. As long as there is mass in the universe there will be a source of nuclear power. Even if in the future we run out of the radioactive material we currently use to fuel nuclear power plants, it would be foolish to assume that we will never again be able to harness nuclear energy in another way.
I don't believe that Iran should have nuclear power because they threaten to bomb the USA if they do get nuclear power.
In none of the back to the future movies have they ever created nuclear power. In the first one they used lighting to generate 1.21 gw of energy, and then the professer fixed it in the beggining of the second movie so you don't need nuclear power to go back.
Thorium will be probable in the future very important as fertile material in nuclear breeder power reactors.