They should not be held responsible as it is people's choice to continue to smoke despite all the health warnings.
No, a person who smokes is responsible for anything they smoke. Tobacco companies do not force people to smoke, and therefore are not responsible for that person's illness or death.
no because you they warn you about the concequences of smoking or chewing
There is NO good reason they should be held responsible.
i dont think so- yes some illnes and death is terrible but its an option to chew or smoke tobacco. holding them responsible is like crying when the fire burns you-- it was your choice to play with the fire.
People have different opinions about this. Some believe the country with the damage should be responsible, but others believe the countries causing the damage should be responsible. One thing most people agree on is that someone does need to be responsible for repairing environmental damage as much as it can be repaired. How they are held responsible and who is held responsible would vary according to the situation of the war.
People have different opinions about this. Some believe the country with the damage should be responsible, but others believe the countries causing the damage should be responsible. One thing most people agree on is that someone does need to be responsible for repairing environmental damage as much as it can be repaired. How they are held responsible and who is held responsible would vary according to the situation of the war.
Parents should be held accountable to some extent for their children's misbehavior, as they play a crucial role in shaping their children's behavior. However, the extent of their responsibility may vary depending on the situation and the age of the child. It is important for parents to provide guidance, set boundaries, and teach their children to be responsible for their actions.
tobacco that is sniffed is called snuff. tobacco that is chewed is called chew. any form of tobacco can be held...
No, people make decisions to do things. People should be responsible for their own actions. You don't see people sueing compact flourecent bulb companies for mercury poisoning when the bulb breaks do you?
Whoever caused the injury should be held liable for it. If your friend did something reckless, which caused the injury, then your friend is solely responsible.
Yes, teenagers should be held responsible for their actions, but within a framework that considers their age and developmental stage. Providing guidance, support, and appropriate consequences can help teenagers learn from their mistakes and grow into responsible adults.
One should only be responsible for one's own actions so the answer is "NO".