yes,they should.Women Have a equel position as men
beacuse women have the potential
no yes they should be able to participate in combat duty
Because women should have equal rights, and should be able to serve there country.
Women were officially allowed to serve in combat roles in the U.S. military starting in 2013 when the Department of Defense lifted the ban on women serving in combat positions. This policy change opened up all military occupations and positions to women, allowing them to participate in direct combat roles. Prior to this, women had served in various capacities during conflicts but were restricted from formal combat roles. The decision marked a significant milestone in gender equality within the armed forces.
probably due to female frailness and lack of strength for such harsh duties (in the past). however, females are now allowed some combat position asignments such as pilots.................
yes, they should be allowed to. women should be treated equaly to men.
yes
Women are allowed to serve in many more positions than they used to. Now in the US women can serve in pretty much every position with the exceptions of combat arms (i.e. infantry, artillery, etc) and spec ops positions.
Men and women should definitely be allowed to fight side by side in combat. There is nothing that a man can do in battle that a woman cannot also do, from firing weapons to providing medical care.
Absolutely not.
Early 1970's. But the US is among countries that still does not allow women to fill active combat duties on the front line, but are allowed to fill other positions such as artillery. Other countries including Canada, Sweden, and Denmark do allow this though.
Yes, women can be in the Australian Army, but they cannot be in direct combat roles. 10.6 % of the positions are occupied by women.