probably due to female frailness and lack of strength for such harsh duties (in the past). however, females are now allowed some combat position asignments such as pilots.................
yes,they should.Women Have a equel position as men
It allowed African Americans to serve in non-combat positions only
It allowed African Americans to serve in non-combat positions only
It allowed African Americans to serve in non-combat positions only
Women have participated in warfare in various capacities throughout history, but formal acceptance in military roles varied by country and conflict. During World War I, many nations began to allow women to serve in non-combat roles, such as nursing and support positions. It wasn't until World War II that women were more widely integrated into military forces, with some countries allowing them to serve in combat roles. In modern times, many countries have fully integrated women into all aspects of military service, including combat positions.
Residency on military bases in the United States are restricted to active-duty members of the armed services. Overseas, and in combat zones, civilian contractors are allowed to live on post.
Women served in the military and other minorities were allowed in combat until the last year of the war.
No, as of now, Japan does not allow foreigners to serve in its military, except for non-combat roles like medical and administrative positions.
Women served in the military and other minorities were allowed in combat until the last year of the war.
Women were allowed in the military from mid-WWII. Any time before that it was considered unladylike or illegal.
Women served in the military and other minorities were allowed in combat until the last year of the war.
In the US military no children will be accepted. That is the bottom line. In Russia, some children and women took part in active combat but the US refrains from doing so because of the horrors that might result when a women or a child dies in combat.