If I had the money sure, but I'd want to make sure they were new high safety designs and I would like to see fast breeders if possible so we can burn the Uranium-238 also.
The city should invest in renewable energy sources like solar power.
I don't believe that Iran should have nuclear power because they threaten to bomb the USA if they do get nuclear power.
Westinghouse is now owned by Toshiba, but you can invest with companies that own existing plants or intend to build new ones. You can find out these companies from website www.nrc.gov
There are many arguments both for and against Nuclear power, but your question is ambiguous and should be interpreted on a personal level.
UK should have nuclear power as it provides sustainability. It also prevents UK from using too much fossil fuel.
Large startup costs and the generation of nuclear waste
No. A nuclear power station is a massive undertaking, and is cost effective only on the large scale.
Certainly yes
yeh brah
Nuclear power is currently the safest, most efficient way of producing power. Fossil fuels such as coal and oil damage the environment whilst solar power and wind power hasn't soared yet. A replacement for nuclear power may be hydrogen fuel cells from water but this would not be as efficient as nuclear power.
Building nuclear power stations is a complex decision that depends on various factors such as safety, cost, environmental impact, and public acceptance. Proponents argue that nuclear power can help reduce greenhouse gas emissions and provide reliable energy, while opponents raise concerns about safety, nuclear waste disposal, and the potential for accidents. Ultimately, each proposed nuclear power project should be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis with these considerations in mind.
No. Yes. That pretty well covers it.