It depends on which one that interests you the most.
The oboe is generally regarded as harder to play than the flute because of the air pressure that is required when blowing into an oboe reed and because of the sensitivity of the oboe reed regarding a proper amount of moisture.
No. I play flute in a band that has an oboe, too, and they are two completely different instruments. You hold the flute sideways and blow into a lip hole and with the oboe you hold it down and blow on a double reed.
the flute is a higher pitch than the oboe
any instrument, i started on flute
Squidward plays clarinet.
It very often can, but the Flute goes very easily above the Oboe range, so nothing above E6. Otherwise the oboist would struggle.
The main four are the flute, oboe, clarinet, and bassoon. Beyond that, there is the piccolo, the English horn, the bass clarinet, and the contrabassoon.
The Oboe is a much better instrument then the Flute. It gives a much better sound and tone quality and does not need to tune as it usually stays in pitch. This instrument may be more expensive, but overall is better and sounds better.
Yes, as a young child, Bach could already play the violin, trumpet, flute, and oboe very well
The flute is longer than a oboe and an oboe has a double reed and a flute does not have a reed. The flute has a cylindrical bore while the oboe has a conical bore. The fingerings are definitely comparable, but not the same. The oboe has a range from Bb below the treble clef to Ab twice above the treble clef, while the flute has a huge range from C below the treble clef to D twice above the treble clef.
Flute technically takes more air to make a sound, but you can play longer on oboe with the same amount of air if you are experienced. With flute, you expel all your air, but with oboe you don't; you only expel a portion before the "used" air that hasn't been expelled forces you to exhale and inhale, only to repeat the process repeatedly throughout the song
No.