CPR and early defibrillation can reduce the risk of damage to the brain from inadequate blood flow. Thus, they can increase the likelihood fo survival.
Yes, early defibrillator usage does result in more effective CPR. This is why many businesses are stocking a version of the defibrillator within their emergency kits.
Yes, early defibrillation does save lives because there is always a higher chance of survival when a person is treated as fast as possible.
The statement is correct.
The frequency approach or experimental probability involves the estimation of the probability of an outcome as the proportion of "successful" outcomes in repeated trials. I put "successful" in quotes because in epidemiology, a "successful" outcome is often a person catching a disease or infection and possibly dying as a result. I am not sure if anyone would consider that a success!
Because it stimulates the heart to 'reset' itself.
It could effect outcome because the person defibrilating the patient may not be able to put the paddles in the correct position. It would be better to use a hands free system.
Biotic because they were once living.
Because it is the process of deriving probability through repeated experiments.
No because the probability scale is from 1 to 0
4.1 is not a valid probability because probability can never be greater than 1.
the probability relates to camouflage because how much of a color there is
they are alike because they both have the last word "probability"
No; because probability can never be less than zero.
Because probability can't be greater than 1.
No, because a probability must lie in the interval [0, 1].