The government should put into law about this issue. The Solar power is free and should be less expensive. Government should work hard to bring the cost of distribution less expensive too
As the world continues to need more and more power, many countries are looking for alternative sources of power. Solar and wind energy are attractive sources of power because they would be cheap, and would not be harmful to the environment.
*Firstly, sunlight is a natural source. *It's cheaper and it's available. *Living costs are reduced. *There are no chemicals,thus healthiest way of living. *It's efficient.
Wind power turns a turbine generator to produce electricity. Light is a form of electricity and electricity can be converted to light by light bulbs and fluorescent lighting, andd radio signals.
yes it should.
It can feed the plants, which produce oxygen for us to breathe.It can produce solar power, which helps reduce our carbon footprint, and the cost of monthly bills.It helps us see.
Yes we should.
yes it can
YES WE SHOULD DO IT BECAUSE IT FREE OF COST AND POLLUTION FREE . PAKISTAN HAS VERY SUITABLE SITUATION TO FOLLOWTHESE PROJECTS.
As the world continues to need more and more power, many countries are looking for alternative sources of power. Solar and wind energy are attractive sources of power because they would be cheap, and would not be harmful to the environment.
Nobody is seriously suggesting domestic nuclear reactors in the basement. All nuclear power plants produce electricity, which can be used in industry or domestically
The Calvin cycle does not require light because it uses ATP and NADPH produced from the light reactions to produce sugar. ATP and NADPH power the reaction to produce sugar from CO2
1.operate by mean of light beam 2.the limitation of light microscope is depend on the resolution power 3.produce 2D image 4.magnification power is up to 1000x
That varies a lot, depending on the type of light bulb. The old-fashioned incandescent light bulbs produce much less light, for the same power, than the fluorescent light bulbs.That varies a lot, depending on the type of light bulb. The old-fashioned incandescent light bulbs produce much less light, for the same power, than the fluorescent light bulbs.That varies a lot, depending on the type of light bulb. The old-fashioned incandescent light bulbs produce much less light, for the same power, than the fluorescent light bulbs.That varies a lot, depending on the type of light bulb. The old-fashioned incandescent light bulbs produce much less light, for the same power, than the fluorescent light bulbs.
Assuming you mean catalytic converter, if the converter is seriously blocked the engine may only idle but will not have the power to move the vehicle. You should have a "check engine" light illuminated also.
At night or when no light in the day time.
None. But it does convert 5 watts of electrical power (energy per unit time) into 5 watts of [light + thermal] power.
*Firstly, sunlight is a natural source. *It's cheaper and it's available. *Living costs are reduced. *There are no chemicals,thus healthiest way of living. *It's efficient.