Yes, some endangered animals have been saved by staying in a zoo and being bred so the population is larger. Also, they need to be helped if they have serious injuries they can be helped and eventually put back into the wild. This can also help them from being attacked or shot by hunters.
Yes. Keeping the animals in a zoo is what keeps many species from extinction. It is wrong to keep animals in bad zoos, but good ones are far better for some than being out in the wild.
Yes, but elephants walk around 30 miles a day out in the wild but in the zoo's they are kept in small confined areas. It is also good because the conserve some animals and are scientifically proven to live longer in zoo's. Either way its kind of the same, there are good reasons but they're are also bad in ways also.
yes they are giving shelter,food and saftey so if not zoos just need to be improved:)
Animals should be kept in zoos because they get trained more better and get more tamed, they get treated well and also looked after.
no animals should not be kept in zoos because they deserve to be free as us humans.
no
There are no good reasons to keep a wild animal in your home. Wild animals are not made to live in captivity and should be allowed to live in their natural habitat.
Because it encourages people to keep animals in captivity, against their will, when they should be in their natural habitat. We should learn about animals by visiting them in the wild or through reading books and watching documentaries.
No it shouldn't. Animals should roam free. Not be cooped up in peoples homes even as a baby.
yes as keeping frogs in captivity is classed as cruelty to animals
Animals should not be used for drug development or medical research for the following reasons: Animals are killed and kept in captivity for the extent of their lives. A lot of the things tested on animals are never even used. It is expensive to keep animals alive for the sole purpose of testing drugs and other devices on them. Animals and humans are not the same.
THEY CERTAINLY SHOULD NOT BE!!!do not delete answers, just add on please.i think tigers should be kept in captivity because they have a safe place to live and have few to none risk's of being harmed. they get supplied water, food, and the love from the zoo keeper's or nature preserves they live in. therefor, i think tigers SHOULD be kept in captivity. my theory has come to a end.
Yes. Ligers only exist in captivity.
It depends keep ur fingers crossed
They live longer in captivity because there are no predators to hurt, kill, or get them infected with a disease or a flesh wound. The animals in captivity also get fed on a regular basis and keep them healthy. They also get watched by doctors to see if they are sick or not.
Of course you can! Just keep the environment clean..... Clean beaches lakes, etc. ~Carson Searcy~
No. Animals belong in the wild. That is their home and that is where they should stay.
That's like asking "Should a child abuser be allowed to keep custody of their child?"