There are different opinions about that. Some say they should because it would be kinder to the animals to stay in their native habitats.
there should be no zoos because in the news it showed that zoo killed animals and rot them by bins
zoos should not be banned
Zoos allows scientists to study animals from up-close in a controlled environment. This has the downside that zoos do not provide anything close to a natural habitat, so animal behavior is inherently deviant from what it would be in the wild.
Pedophiles
no
The Los Angeles zoo is close to Hollywood.
Absolutely not. Zoos have been instrumental in the conservation and repopulation of certain species. They also inspire the love of nature in millions of children. Animals which populate zoos are typically unfit for the wild, and are given a second chance to happily live in captivity. I think it would be a terrible loss for people, and animals if zoos were shut down.
Zoos allows scientists to study animals from up-close in a controlled environment. This has the downside that zoos do not provide anything close to a natural habitat, so animal behavior is inherently deviant from what it would be in the wild.
a
There should not be zoos because animals lose their natural habitat.It is cruel to them as well.If some one says that the zoos should be there hen I'd say that well animals should have as much freedom as people.
No they shouldn't cause they die of starvation in zoos
Zoos should not be banned because the animals live longer, can't be killed and people learn about them at the zoo