If organisms have similar genes, then they are closely related.
common ancestry
yes
Common ancestor, or convergent evolution to the same function
It implies that the organism shares a common ancestor.
Similarities in amino acid sequences tell us the the genes coding for these proteins are similar. Similar genes are due to shared ancestry ie the organisms have evolved from a common ancestor in the past. Differences in amino acid sequence tell us that mutations have occurred in the genes since the organisms separated from the common ancestor. The bigger the differences, the longer the organisms have been separated.
They exist because all these genes have descended from the genes of common ancestors.
Genes and chorosomes
Many of their genes are the same.
ancestor
Homozygous: genes are similar Hetrozygous: genes are not similar
The evidence that favours the coelacanth as the closest living relative of amphibians is their resemblance with the lungfish. They seem to share similar genes in most aspects.Ê
Common ancestor, or convergent evolution to the same function
It implies that the organism shares a common ancestor.
It implies that the organism shares a common ancestor.
It implies that the similar Genes are very, very Ancient.Edit: No, it doesn't. The genes can be fairly new, despite the organisms being very dissimilar. It implies that the organisms share a common ancestor, not that they're ancient. Please do not reply to questions if you have no idea what you're talking about.
They use dna for sure and they may or may not use similar specification of genes
Because, in the very distant past, humans and worms had a common ancestor.
They exist because all these genes have descended from the genes of common ancestors.
They are similar in size shape , position of centromere and genes .Homologous chromosomes are similar in the pattern they are stained, their lengths, and most importantly they have genes of the for a certain characteristics in the same area.